daisycutter

i wonder what provoked majak, looked very strange........and a bit unsavoury with cox not even facing him colonwood might have toned down the incident description because they knew something preceded it?

same difference, wcw ownership, mortgage, monopoly etc

nsw don't have a mortgage on stupidity, as we are starting to realise

i think this should be titled a hyperhypothetical 🙄

personally couldn't care less.....unless it's us playing however, if i were geelong i'd rather at this stage be playing on the mcg as this is more the size of ground to win a flag on, rather than their skinny non-standard cardinia park

bt thinks a high school is for tall people

why does it have to be either......i'd rather neither it even rhymes

if we hadn't drawn with hawks or if umps got it right vs crows first time for a draw at least......then it wouldn't matter if we lose to geelong (by not too much) we would finish on top by % or if the afl agreed error in cats vs lions game was paid..... umpiring howlers could cost us the minor premiership......gggrrrrrr!

yes, i think the very best we could hope for is the finals teams....maybe.....organising scratch matches, but even that might be a bridge too far

is it even worth having a heavily compromised vfl finals? probably benefit those with afl finals teams, but

and talk of a possible 9pm ro 5am curfew too

hmmmmm........your dogs must die a lot younger than mine.......what do you feed them? 😲

bummers or methos pick your poison

freo's lead down to 6 pts

eagles ahead on all stats, reckon they'll catch them in 4q

hibbo had much better stats than smith. may for smith

jaisus....how many marks have we dropped?

player touched lower leg maybe. no way the ball. enough to overturn ump ffs

doesn't seem to be on ch7 in melb anyone have any more info (other than fox/kayo)?

protected area rules need to be looked at too. too many inconsequential minor incidents given 50m. I also can't see why the protected zone doesn't apply to the attacking team. doesn't make sense for them to roam free as a bird anywhere in the zone. when it's a set shot close to goal the umps don't allow attacking side players in the zone but elsewhere on field they do. on the stand rule, i'd say 50% of defenders are not on the real mark position. umps rarely actually set the mark except when it's a set goal shot. and finally the umps lately see to have gone really hot on play-on calls, even when the players feet have not moved off the mark all in all, setting the mark, determining play-on and the protected area cause a lot of confusion

no ducking ifea, olf fee

gmba with no crowds working well for cats these last 2 weeks.....lol

stewart out is massive. their defence is seriously damaged without him he's one of my favourite non-dee players, so reliable, tough and effective. would/will be all-australian

oh for crying out loud...... a little bit of friendly adf interaction can only be helpful and positive for everyone