Everything posted by daisycutter
-
same here webber. was staying in cotswalds, drove to a pub in oxford in the wee hours to watch. all over by quarter time. only saving grace was not facing all the barbs back home and forgiving my wife for booking a holiday in finals month. -
jaisus wcw, that was 39 years ago 😲 i'm assuming you must have been a toddler then 😉
-
yes, but in this case a state of the commonwealth can't issue visa for interstate travel a better example is if i visit certain countries that are hotspots for yellow fever and i return to australia uninnoculated then on arrival i am put into quarantine for 2 weeks and the airline is given a substantial fine. this nearly happened to me about 40 years ago. i ended up in venezuela after a business trip change and when leaving to go home from caracas, the local qantas agent (who wouldn't know australia from austria) wouldn't let me board because i hadn't had the yellow fever innoculation. the only reason i got picked up was a couple of weeks earlier some australian got back to australia uninnoculated and qantas got fined, so had sent out a strong warning worldwide to all their agents
-
agree ethan, but something happened and colonwood clearly lied for some reason i'm not trying to exonerate majak either, just wondering why he did what he did
-
because brayshaw was impeding/holding him? or something else? at least it looked like brayshaw was holding. in this case there seems no apparent reason, hence the questioning. i'm not suggesting the r word, just thinking it might have been something we didn't see
-
i wonder what provoked majak, looked very strange........and a bit unsavoury with cox not even facing him colonwood might have toned down the incident description because they knew something preceded it?
-
same difference, wcw ownership, mortgage, monopoly etc
-
nsw don't have a mortgage on stupidity, as we are starting to realise
-
i think this should be titled a hyperhypothetical 🙄
-
personally couldn't care less.....unless it's us playing however, if i were geelong i'd rather at this stage be playing on the mcg as this is more the size of ground to win a flag on, rather than their skinny non-standard cardinia park
-
bt thinks a high school is for tall people
-
why does it have to be either......i'd rather neither it even rhymes
-
if we hadn't drawn with hawks or if umps got it right vs crows first time for a draw at least......then it wouldn't matter if we lose to geelong (by not too much) we would finish on top by % or if the afl agreed error in cats vs lions game was paid..... umpiring howlers could cost us the minor premiership......gggrrrrrr!
-
-
-
and talk of a possible 9pm ro 5am curfew too
-
hmmmmm........your dogs must die a lot younger than mine.......what do you feed them? 😲
-
bummers or methos pick your poison
-
freo's lead down to 6 pts
-
eagles ahead on all stats, reckon they'll catch them in 4q
-
hibbo had much better stats than smith. may for smith
-
jaisus....how many marks have we dropped?
-
player touched lower leg maybe. no way the ball. enough to overturn ump ffs
-
doesn't seem to be on ch7 in melb anyone have any more info (other than fox/kayo)?
-
protected area rules need to be looked at too. too many inconsequential minor incidents given 50m. I also can't see why the protected zone doesn't apply to the attacking team. doesn't make sense for them to roam free as a bird anywhere in the zone. when it's a set shot close to goal the umps don't allow attacking side players in the zone but elsewhere on field they do. on the stand rule, i'd say 50% of defenders are not on the real mark position. umps rarely actually set the mark except when it's a set goal shot. and finally the umps lately see to have gone really hot on play-on calls, even when the players feet have not moved off the mark all in all, setting the mark, determining play-on and the protected area cause a lot of confusion
