Roost It

Except the fact that by not answering the question the media make up their own story. With Watts it's common knowledge he's not a hard worker and that those in the FD have had enough, just look at his preseason and end of season. You're still not facing the reality that only 2 clubs showed any serious interest. That sums up the player and totally supports the FD. Read what Pelchen said about how the FD handled the trade period and then go cry in your weetbix

That's not what I said. His expectTions relate to preparation, commitment, buy in. Watts admits football isn't his be all and end all. Tell that to Dustin Martin. If Watts was at Richmond he'd already be at Port

From what I hear the players like and respect Goodwin. Of course he has plenty still to learn. What he has done is clearly define expectations of the group. Those that don't buy in will find the door

He's a party boy, that's the facts. He's gone, I liked him so did my young kids. Do we already like Lever more? Hell yeh. If you can't convince you're young kids it's all good you've got bigger issues than Watts playing for Port. And yes I'll boo him with tongue firmly in cheek

Player to player we have a superior list

It's second or third hand information. If Weed doesn't understand now he soon will.

It's not depressing. The fact Watts was well liked has nothing to do with it. Surely you know that.

Performing under pressure is critical to success

Do you actually read what you post. Wow that's some serious arm flapping you get up to

We have the players to win the flag, doesn't mean we will but we have them. Our list is far superiors to Richmonds. We still need some more years under the belt I would think

If he worked really hard and hit contests we wouldn't even be having this discussion

Yes the club overpaid him but that's not Goodeins fault

Yes the club overpaid him but that's not Goodeins fault

The club has secured Lever, easily a top 4 pick was he in the draft add Oliver, Petracca, Viney and Hogan and away we go

We didn't pay overs for Lever. The reason we're part paying Watts wage is because he has low market value. That's not the clubs fault that's because he's never worked hard enough or hit enough contests

That's so cute

How else does a club move a well liked underperforming player on with the sharks and the media constantly circling. As a club you're in an impossible situation

The club asked Watts to explore his options, nothing more. Good wins view on him have been known since the start of the season. For those rattling on about how badly it's been handled accept that there really is no other way. I'd blame his manager and the media for the [censored] not the club

Unfortunately it required winning a contested ball first so he wasn't available

Had Watts applied himself in the same way Riewoldt did you have not idea how he would have turned out

The intention to drive yourself to be the absolute best you can be has little to do with those around you. It comes from within. Jack doesn't have it.

We disagree

Had he worked that hard he could of been anything

He was a 196cm number 1 draft pick. Are you saying he as recruited as a third tall

We recruited Jack to be the next Nick Riewoldt. I'll guarantee had he worked as hard on and off the field as Nick he'd be our number 1 forward while we wait for Hogan to fulfill his potential. The fact he's a lazy 3rd forward sums up exactly why we're moving him on for peanuts. Sure he's a good guy and sure most of us like him but I want a flag not a nice 3rd tall to help us finish 2nd