Jump to content

DiscoStu17

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DiscoStu17

  1. This is about as late as you get unless you’re delisting them. Mind you there were some leaks months ago on a few resigning - so they weren’t left until now, just announced now. If they were delisted, these kids would be snapped up by our opposition before they got in their car.
  2. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Barracking for Daniher is like you’re driving a big yank tank V8 from the 70s. You might have 400HP, but no [censored] steering. It might not start. Or the accelerator might jam on and send you over a cliff, or to your destination in a hurry. You just don’t know.
  3. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Almost and then not and then Jesse (again)
  4. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Carn GWS!
  5. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Kenny might have been 2 post shots away from being moved on. Personally, I couldn’t care less about the banter before, during and after the game. Live and die blah blah etc etc Some people, like Sam, are a bit sensitive to it but showing that will only attract more. I wouldn’t advocate it in tennis. But this should still be a bit more combative than that.
  6. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not sure. Thought on the reverse angle he might have clipped the knee on the way down. Hang on - I thought you were talking about the earlier one. Yeah the one after htb was weird.
  7. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    3.30 minutes 4 points ???
  8. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Imagine that being called deliberate??😀
  9. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Nah. Whoever wins beats the swans. One of us has got to be right.
  10. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    50m?? Whoa
  11. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Burgoyne is probably Port’s best player
  12. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    At least it’s a reasonable contest
  13. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    15min 3 goals Possible? can they?
  14. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Very very hard
  15. Couldn’t ASIC ban Joe from companies for 4 years AND talking [censored] about the MFC?
  16. I think he’s been talking to Abdul.
  17. DiscoStu17 replied to MadAsHell's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not sure if we can really compare a 203cm player with one that is 198cm. It’s a matter of scale. People on here have been calling out that Verrall is too short - but now they’re suggesting someone smaller? Seems like he can take a mark, but he is always the biggest dog in the comp. That won’t happen over here. If he’s mobile enough, he might slot into a chb/fb position, but would probably get monstered by McKay or run off his feet by Cameron etc like most players.
  18. DiscoStu17 replied to MadAsHell's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What position? Smaller than the boys we currently have and a few years older. Wasn’t he mainly chb for Werribee?
  19. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That seems to be the case. Perhaps we should shorten the title to CP Then we could rename it Consequentia Perennis
  20. DiscoStu17 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hopefully mainly MFC on here, but sometimes I’m a little uncertain.
  21. Really ****ty news for Frosty. This might seriously affect hawks being able to blanket the port talls. Less worried about them against the sydney forward setup - but they have to get through next week first.
  22. One of the reasons I don’t agree with the bye - there should be a greater benefit for finishing top4. But it will never change now.
  23. Yeah. Bowel screening?
  24. Like one of those that need to be posted away in a bag.
  25. Numpty commentators thought it could’ve been touched twice!