Jump to content

No. 31

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by No. 31

  1. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Cripps has been incredibly consistent this season. Only one or two so-so games. Has really improved on some areas of his game as well. I expected him to poll very well. Even in games where Carlton were poor overall, he usually stood out. Some of the other Blues 'stars' could learn something about consistency from the Captain ...
  2. Gus is all class [watching the Brownlow right now] 🥂
  3. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Bingo. Accurate and succint summary 👍😊
  4. Sam to Princes Park, simpler to orchestrate and cheaper for MFC too 😉 Carlton needs to shred the Houston file though.
  5. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I don't think MFC will be getting a 5 year lease with 1 option to renew. There will certainly be specific long term leasing arrangements made. Also, the land where the admin/training building is on may possibly not be Crown Land, some portions of land outside the race tract at Caulfield RC are held by the MRC as freehold. The two training ovals will certainly be on Crown Land though. Might even be subject to a specific Act of Parliament as Princes Park is. If you want freehold land then you have to look at urban fringe like Tullamarine or Dingley. If you want an inner urban area a long term lease is far more likely. As mentioned abive, people in the A.C.T. still purchase real estate on 100 year leases.
  6. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Christian, blink twice.
  7. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He is a Red Bull brand ambassador. Likely catering his training for the stage of recovery he is at. Getting paid and getting some training in early and a bit of time out of Melbourne & Australia. Win-win-win I say.
  8. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
  9. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I can see a giant red & blue billboard on Neerim Road ... McDEMONS Glen Huntly, VIC "Home of the Big Trac"
  10. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That is for another component of redeveloping Caulfield Racecourse, proposed new grandstand, new mounting yards etc has nothing to do with redeveloping the reserve inside the track where MFC ovals would be located.
  11. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ed making a comeback after retirement. Nice, I wish him all the best even if he is more of a midfield tagger than a forward.
  12. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Getting in shape for pre-season at Princes Park 👍 [puts on kevlar helmet & flak jacket 😁]
  13. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Did you check with Dutton though ... there is a pond there for potentially cooling a modular reactor 😁
  14. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The Racecourse Reserve might be in the State electorate of Caulfield held by the Liberal Party but it is also in the Federal electorate of Macnamara held by the ALP. Sitting member is Josh Burns, who does have interest in footy (but I think he is a Carlton supporter). Lobbying never goes astray 😉 Terri Bracks on the board wouldn't be a bad idea, links to State ALP and a Dees fan.
  15. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Some positive news 👍 Why is there an expectation that the State Government fund this? 🫤 Surely funding comes from several sources, MFC, club donors, Vic Govt, Commonwealth Govt and the AFL??
  16. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Whilst waiting for page 184 and the news to drop tomorrow I just wanted to touch on some historical points about MFC, MCC & MCG (because I am a bit of a history nerd 🤓) raised in the last few pages in this thread. Whilst the Dees are inextricably linked to the MCC and MCG there are some myths prevalent about this. Melbourne Football Club was not founded by the MCC but rather some MCC members founded a football club. The formal link between the MCC and MFC was inked in 1890, some 31-32 years after MFC was established. The MCG was not the Dees first main ground. Whilst a few matches were played here and there at the MCG itself, MFC had its own ground next to the MCG which was nicknamed the 'Gravel Pit'. In 1885 another ground was established where Olympic Park (now Collingwood's training oval) used to be and this was called the Friendly Societies Ground. Also in 1885-1890 period the main football tenant of the MCG was actually Carlton. Technically the Blues are first football tenant of the MCG. In 1890 when the MCC formally incorporated MFC as its football component then the MCG became the Dees main homeground and the Dees the main footballing tenant of the MCG. Yes, ideally the Dees should have developed the Olympic Park site but Collingwood muscled their way into that [and other factors ... can't change that outcome now]. Now, MFC have an opportunity to get a home base in Caulfield which is inside their old historic recruiting zone where they do have supporters who reside nearby and hopefully this comes to fruition. Looking forward to some positive news tomorrow ... 😊
  17. No. 31 replied to dazzledavey36's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It would be sad to see Owies leave the Blues. He is a bit of an enigma as a forward, has definite limitations as a footballer but yet still has a good goal scoring record. He isn't really a crumbing forward, he moves into open space to take marks and is a solid kick for goal. I think the market will pay him more than he is currently on at Carlton and the Blues want to reserve cap space for Weitering, TDK and maybe some new incoming trades. That is why he is being allowed to explore his options Definitely would not be a flop inward trade like Billings. Owies will earn his keep.
  18. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Leo, my point was that people in every day life do indeed factor in the location, the convenience of travel to, the standard of physical facilities etc when making choices about employment. AFL footballers will do the same. To think you can have substandard facilities and attract top line trade talent is naive. Especially as in recent years some clubs have built new facilities and some clubs have revamped old facilities. I recently moved to brand new, modern offices (never occupied previously), quality facilities in a great location and it played a factor in me staying in my current role rather than actively seeking a new position elsewhere.
  19. No. 31 replied to FrothiesLiam's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Kennedy is a decent inside mid, but is slow pace wise. Has been used to fill in other positions this season and always puta an effort in. Solid when kicking for goals. Carlton are sending Cerra to specialists in Qatar for his hamstrings so that looks like they see him staying at the Princes Park. George Hewitt probably gets in slightly ahead of Kennedy and now their is also the youngster Lord who can provide midfield depth so Kennedy is free to look elsewhere. Kennedy is a popular player with supporters and many would be sad to see him go but changes to the Blues midfield mix are needed.
  20. No. 31 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Page 20 of today's 'The Age' has an article from 17 Sept 1996 about the proposed Demons-Hawk merger. What was the issue with the contentious proxy votes? 🤔
  21. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Whoa, now its a game again ...
  22. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    This could really blow out. Hipwood is a train wreck.
  23. No. 31 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    ... and Carlton after making the Prelim Final last year.
  24. No. 31 replied to Romey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    When looking for a new job (say it is an office job), do you look at the location, condition, style, facilities of the office, the building its located in and the area it is in?
  25. If in the early days Port & Norwood came across to the VFL instead of founding the Adelaide Crows, it would have worked. Now it is too late for Norwood, that ship has sailed. A 20th team from Perth is more likely tbh, has a larger population base and likely to grow more in population in the future. Kangaroos to Canberra with a few NT games, can still be called the Northern Kangaroos and the competition is set.