Jump to content

redandbluemakepurple

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Glenn Lazarus, NRL Melbourne Storm, The Brick with Eyes
  2. Sharp was OK with limited time. Kolstrup marginal but up and coming. Fullerton out. Verrall. in, mainly as a backup ruck. Saw Casey struggle as against Giants. I take more notice of when Casey is under pressure. JVR was ordinary unlike Verrall. Laurie, Billings and Sestan got a lot of ball but their disposal was scrappy under pressure.
  3. 2 weeks and/or OAM, F C Karma, jumped up and bit Darcy Moore on the arrrrse. Intentional, high impact, low contact.
  4. He doesn't want the ball! He should be made to by playing him at fullback at Casey or at FF with the ball bombing on his head.
  5. his day job is ruck-coach and was not expected to be called up.
  6. Two turnovers by Rivers and a missed push-out by Nankervis took the gloss off a bit but a Massive win 🤪
  7. It was deliberate! "Careless", is a short step and a negligent act by the MRP.
  8. For once, this need not be a matter of opinion. The players can be hooked up while on the exercise bike. A good question for the Board to ask.
  9. AJ did very little in the AFL.
  10. I alternately think that he doesn't rate defending. If the Bulldog defenders had been tighter on Fritsch and others, they would have another premiership. Then, next year, he was moaning about the close attention that his forwards were receiving; ironic due to my point above. 2021 - 2023 when MFC defended them out of the corridor. He had no answer.
  11. Casey at a convenient location and time.. Watch the new guys for three quarters. Watch the seniors for 2 1/2 and slink out.
  12. redandbluemakepurple posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It is a conflict of interest for those participating in the making of the decision. They would have a natural desire to look after someone that they know. They would be tempted to make DLers smile by picking one of their favourites.
  13. redandbluemakepurple posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That would be a conflict of interest for the selection panel