Clintosaurus

Of course they are - it's a nepo baby v a club in the 15-18 range of HQ love. HQ have a vested interest in GC being good so picks only best outcome for them on that.

The AFL does not care for equalisation. Their strategy is maximisation - of revenue, TV viewing numbers, controlling the media cycle. Certain clubs being good most of the time helps this. You all know who they are - most are good right now.

Media thinking they are part of trades getting done. How cute.

Zanker was held but ump never paying as Freo winning was the approved result

Rigged over there 2 years in a row.

Cheats

Jesus the umpires

Definitely there are more than plenty. They should [censored] off and support St Kilda.

Another soft as butter free

Hawks in top 2 be appealing to the AFL

#fteekickfreo

Commentary ****house and also done off a TV

Interstate trips suck

AFL will get involved to make it work for the Suns. Also, keep 24 and trade out 28 if required.

Media want us getting picks only as more chance of being like Richmond, West Coast or Norf. In their minds anyway.

Lamby hopefully like this

Media only want their favourites to be good. Look how hard Mitch Cleary works for Geelong. Their narratives are a joke.

They'll be [censored] every other time with them 3 in there.

Yes!! As are most of their covers. I love Eleanor.

Broncos Rams Cowboys

Thought we had lost when TL was picked off in the end zone as I was in going into a meeting. Nice surprise to find out of the win an hour later.

JFC. Is there a player the media won't try to get out of the club?

Jenkins just another nuff wanting us to accept [censored] all for Tracc or anyone. Yet if they were at Geelong or the media favourite clubs it be 3 firsts and a best 23 player.

The media really are ****wits. The derision MFC gets from 99% of them is ridiculous. If Tracc was at the Pies Korn etc would say he is worth 3 top 10 picks.

15th yes Eeyores hey?