Jump to content

adonski

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by adonski

  1. We've already got a BBB mate
  2. GWS still have a stack of talent but I'm not sure they have the bookends. Phil Davis is cooked, Hogan can't string more than a few games together, Toby Green is suspended for the first five rounds & they've just sent a very serviceable forward in Finlayson packing for a 3rd rounder. The cherry on top is Bobby Hill now on the way out. I do agree Richmond could bounce back but a lot depends on whether they still have the hunger.
  3. We won from the Brisbane trade - Recieve: 2020: Picks 18, 19 (1933 points, equivalent of pick 5) 2021: 33 (563 points) Total: 2496 (equivalent of pick 3) Give-up: 2020: Pick 25, 68, 69 2021: Pick 18 Total: 1849 (equivalent of pick 6) We gain points equivalent of pick 29, not lose
  4. Only side that has made meaningful short term list changes is the Blues to this point
  5. adonski replied to Turner's topic in Melbourne Demons
    We have Spargo, Laurie, Chandler competing for one spot. Hill has shown flashes of brilliance but another small probably not on our list of needs.
  6. A little bit. But we wouldn't of have Pickett, Rivers & Bowey out there on grandfinal day if we weren't prepared to do these things.
  7. Knightmare is a nuff
  8. An 80 year contract but in dog years?
  9. adonski replied to Turner's topic in Melbourne Demons
    3rd round? Giants would want something decent. Has shown flashes.
  10. Reckon JT loves the lack of exposure. Keeps the gems hidden.
  11. It’s Mitch Knevitt SZN
  12. Historically, Carlton's list build strategy of buying every second player on the list gets your foot in the door of finals but falls short of matching it with the big boys. Will be interesting to see how it plays out over the next couple of years.
  13. If that is true, sack Norf's list management team. 2x top 5 picks plus a late 1st for pick 1! And they reject it!
  14. Couldn't believe this. They have Walsh to recontract next year too.
  15. Given Mac is projected to go top 10 by many, I don't think the Giants will be able to wait until 13
  16. 17 & 37 is equivalent to pick 9 We'd probably be able to grab GWS' pick 13, but is sacrificing a second rounder for a four spot upgrade worth it?
  17. Peter Bell has prepared a very attractive contract for Jackson with benefits such as tattoo removal vouchers & an impeccable dental plan
  18. I don't think we really have the currency to grab another first rounder do we?
  19. Channelling @goodwindees I'm THIRSTY
  20. Midfielder or we riot
  21. Can't be that big of an issue if Lockhart never played
  22. Fair enough. Personally I'd be really disappointed if we spent a first round pick on a medium sized defender. I think it's one of those positions you can mould a player into. Both my head & my heart are telling me we'll go for the best available mid (not a massive prediction given it's a midfield heavy draft).