titan_uranus

Wheatley's playing well, is he across HF? OOh, Goal to Miller as I write

Quarter Time: Richmond 3.6.24 Melbourne 5.3.33 2 late goals to Richo hurt us. 2 goals each to Bartram and Bruce.

Goal to Miller: Melbourne 4.3.27 Richmond 1.6.12

Goal to Bruce after Hyde got the first in 25 seconds - Rich 1.1.7 Melb 1.0.6

Looking to India could be a good idea mfcrox, given they like sport so much, but I don't know whether it would cotton on because they've got so many other things to worry about. Still I reckon could work.

Yeah well unfortunately for them they're about to drop to 9th thanks to Collingwood's 'blockbuster fatigue'

Not entirely related, but Carlton's in front midway through the final term, they're in the 8 if they win

Any late changes?

16.5 points is the barrier: 2 consecutive years under this and you get a PP at beginning of 1st round.

Should beat Richmond at home, and by round 17, St Kilda will have put the cue in the rack so they'll beat the Saints at home too. They've yet to play us, and could steal wins vs Essendon and Freo. On their current form they'll go close to beating the Saints, will beat Essendon and us, who knows about West Coast, so I wouldn't worry about them either. I think the real danger is Richmond, especially if we beat them today. They're fading badly.

Bloody North Melbourne: whenever I tip them they lose, whenever I don't they win.

Looks like he'll be missing for a couple of weeks. Was quite stupid.

Yeah I reckon you're right. Davey mustn't be fully fit so they've left out one emergency in case. I watched most of the match today: Sandy were shocking. They turned it over repeatedly by foot and there was no real focal target up forward. Daniel Bell looked alright, but I'm no expert.

Well Freo's started well against North, but I get the feeling they'll lose.

Apparently Travis Cloke is the Collingwood equivalent of Mayfair. That is, he is the classiest specimen at the CFC.

Freo and West Coast are still dangerous.

Last time these two clubs played at the Dome was in 2005: you may remember Nathan Brown sustaining quite a bad injury in that game. We won, too. But yes, it's ludicrous that two MCG tenants are playing at what is really a neutral ground.

I too have grown accustomed to the logo, which is something I didn't expect when I first saw it. But we must bring back the demon. It's good for the kids to have that icon, like the mascot at the ground or in those comic things.

YES!

Yeah I tend to agree Doggo, with the rise of Garland and Warnock, he doesn't need to be played in defence. I reckon when we had Carroll only DB, and Daniher last year, were using Frawley in defence in the hope that he'd be the answer to our KP problems. Now that Garland and Warnock have KP defence down (hopefully), DB can release Frawley to another position. And we all know we need to unearth some talent in the forward line, so who knows, Frawley might just solve some problems.

Interesting discussion here....... McLean is slow. Not too slow. Just slow. There are plenty of slow midfielders in the comp. What he lacks in pace he makes up for in strength, aggression, possessions and to a lesser extent, leadership. He also takes the opposition tagger, freeing up Jones.

I reckon the reasoning behind it is good, and it does help the rest of the backline in terms of his experience, but I'd prefer Whelan down back to Macca. McDonald is a midfielder, not a defender.

At the moment I can't envision Rivers playing an uninterrupted 5 games, let alone half a season. A good read though. Nice work.

Not only is he injury prone, but his form over the last 2 years or so where he's been able to string together many games is not exactly super. In fact it's not that good at all. Don't want him.

Good outs for us, they lose their full-back and some of their run. Rance was a first rounder last year, wasn't he? Is it his first game?