Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

Awwww, come ON!...

I hate clues that just add more names to link! 😄

I see I'm not the only one visiting your profile, clutching at straws, @old55! Not @Demonstone, though; I'm presuming he's been a long-time admirer?

What, getting her into music early? 😉

Looks like there's a few nibblers. Get on it!

Yep!

@Demonstone has just reminded me I was going to bump this. Yep, let's see if there's any stragglers out there, re-fired-up by his latest.😊

I did, cos of that messaging problem I had. I'll try again, and I, too, suspect. In the end it certainly wasn't rocket science (although, curiously, very fundamental to it!)

You haven't seen my message @Demonstone???

I'm presuming 'aggressive', attached to 'philisophically', and AR's '...we had it taken away from us...(at times last year)' means in game style - i.e. moving the ball on more quickly, instinctively, to open (riskier?) areas of the field - not physical aggression. No mention the fall-offs were fitness-related - indeed he referred to 'getting the (work vs footy) balance right' in Jan/Feb. He also settles the Gawn/Grundy question: rotation through the forward line but not as key scorers; rather, creating situations for scoring (e.g. 'engineered' stoppages?) And JVR: 'keys' picked on 'form' and 'ready to go' and 'structure'. So not a Round 1 lock? Though he then refers to Saints and Tigers (and other) practices, evidently linking them - not just the 'real stuff' - to such decisions.

...and have a go at a header for this very average demonstration of delivering a ball to a target by our heroes:

(You fell right in there, @dworship!) Waddayareckon, @Demonstone (and @Flaubert), D'Land dividing into the 'Haves' and 'Have nots'?

RIP (somewhat obviously) Denholm Reynholm: Would have been at home herein!😄

...aaaand... ...now I'm seeing myself out.

Think of all the weight he would have lost anyway...

So the exorcism is scheduled in for under the tree at Missus Fritta's?

I call impostor! Uncle doesn't stoop to such commonnesses as 'sheila' and 'yap'!! He's been kidnapped!!! Presumably the ransom message will come via this thread. Mods, is the Constabulary tapped in?

Keep 'em guessing, good sir/madam/person 😄

Dare I say it, in these 'crazy times' as you call them, Mr Leg: regarding gender identification, this - in the sense of the act of persuading - has taken on a whole new connotation for those wrestling with theirs...

Stepping back in for my strictly rationed dose of No T$ No B$, Mr Leg, I first need to ask, has anyone ever suggested the second 'No' might be misleading advertising? Then, re your post: As if the profession doesn't have enough to deal with, reputation-wise! And look out everyone; I've got spare time on my hands...

He'd be the new 'Flash' though?... (Hi @WalkingCivilWar😊)

Ummm, just checking: do we know for sure that the men weren't present? As to the men's engagement with the women, Ben Brown says hullo, as does Jake Lever of the 'watching the GF' footage. And the footage of much of the team watching the (I think) AFLW6 GF.

He can regain any lost conditioning by lining up in the goal square for a month or so... Cue sound of fullbacks' knees knocking (each other, not Max's back). @Gator, thanks for that. Though I do recall Stephen May came off pretty comfortably with what proved to be somewhat spectacular! (though somewhat short of the leg injury a first glance at your avatar suggested to me!)

@Deebymistake, a discussion of your display name would find a home in the current arc of The No T$ No B$ Thread! On this thread, big 👍update to all contributors.