GM11

6 Hanks 5 Purcell 4 Pearce 3 Hore 2 McNamara 1 Gillard

Hardest thing Zak Butters did all night - picked on a trainer - [censored].

6 Hanks 5 Pearce 4 McNamara 3 Hore 2 Mackin 1 Gay

AFL footballers. Should be able to kick the ball. Worst losses have been solely due to not converting inside 50s. Shouldn't need to be coached on kicking at this level. Players need to take ownership of this.

6 Spargo 5 Spargo 4 Spargo 3 Spargo 2 Spargo 1 Spargo

Played 3 players short & no sub.

Why is Maynard training with us? Or is it just a lookalike?

Risky to go with a tall unless Max is really suspect. I'm thinking Hibberd.

Amazed that Razor can't get a gig because he can't bounce the ball. There are 3 others out there that can handle the bounce. There aren't that many bounces in a game now and Razor is one of the better decision makers IMO.

Couldn't believe what i was hearing from him after his vehemence in the days prior. Just another suck-up like the rest.

Didn't hear it, but I know it's true. In fact I suspect more like 6 weeks and could have been a send off as well. They don't stand for that stuff.

I just want to see Port or GWS take Colonwood out in the prelim. Both capable.

Does this mean now that there is no careless grading if you bump? Only intentional?

Grubby wasn't it.

Someone earlier asked about the meaning of "running dead'. Same face comes to mind when I hear that expression.

Can see Colonwood losing to both Port and GWS. They struggled to beat us when we couldn't buy a goal.

If they don't appeal this, I will always believe the whole thing was a face saving, pander to CFC, farce. So on with the Collingwood Football League Final Series.

Can't see how he can get 1 week. They can find no case and he gets none. AFL would have to appeal that. They can't downgrade 'careless conduct'. They can't downgrade 'high contact'. They can downgrade 'severe' to 'high' impact. = 2 + weeks. Would expect the AFL to appeal that. Only other outcome then is 3 + weeks. I assume that any appeal against the tribunal finding would apply to guilt or innocence, not to vary the proscribed penalty.

Sure I heard him on commentary agreeing that there was nothing in it.

Worst part is so many hang off their every moronic word. Add Dunstall, JB and "Clickbait" Cornes.

Love every word of this. Hopefully we can start to get rid of some of the suck ups & morons from commentary and media as well.

Thing is we had no one who did do it well. Actually think Grundy offers way more than JVR has recently.

Security.. at the MCG.. non existent. I once saw two older ladies removed by one suit & 2 security guys. May have been caught on camera dosing up their lattes from a flask. Any serious bad behaviour they don't want to know.

Never been tough mate. Just a bog ordinary grub who knows there's no retaliation.

As distinct from black & white bias glasses?