ManDee

dazzledavey36, on 25 Apr 2015 - 12:06 AM, said: No problems here? Do you want more?

iv'a my problem here is the double standard. I am happy with the level of censorship providing it is consistent. The photos have been published in The Age and The Herald Sun so I presume that they meet societies level of probity. So if this site has higher standards so be it, but let it apply to males and females equally.

On this site multiple semi nude footballers have been posted and lewd comments made. When I posted the photos ( that appeared in The Age & the Herald Sun ) I did make a reference that in hindsight may be seen in poor taste. I removed the photos and the comment. I did not know Tayla was 17 at the time one of the photos was taken. So I can see the uneasiness but it is one sided and therefore sexist. Minors should not be exploited and I did not believe that I was doing that. Would I make the same comment about a male footballer? Yes. Would I make it about a teenage footballer? Probably not. I think this site should be fair and balanced. In future I expect any similar reference to teenage footballers be treated with the same zealous censorship. Any mention of boners promptly removed. Sorry to anyone that may have been offended that was not my intention, it was an attempt at humour.

But it's OK to get a boner over Hogan? Get some perspective.

Burn was started mid last week. Ref: ABC reporter that lives in the area.

Nothing required here Col.

For an extra $50 I get a share of some spare oil money they have to get rid of. Bargain.

It would have to be the 2nd pick in next years draft with a WADA rider.

As part of the interview "The Chemist" showed his prowess with Friday is Muffin day at EFC!

Is it any good? I use gmail. boom tish! Thanks I've been Mandee I'm here until I receive a pardon.

Was that meat or meth?

I'm still laughing at the thought of a Linda Lovelace deep throat solution to bringing down the board. I thought you meant the Woodford Bernstein option, but I couldn't resist.

Linda Lovelace?

Put a demon jumper on him and think of England.

My issue was not with your reasoning or conclusions. Your argument that if anyone disagreed they should re read your post as if you could not be wrong, that was my point. Your conclusion being that your assumptions are beyond reproach. In order to reach your conclusions you have made educated guesses. You may well be right. Your "If you think otherwise, please read this post again." does not leave room for a contrary point of view and reeks of arrogance. The problem with guessing the WADA outcome is the lack of precedent. The issue that many MFC supporters seem to have is that there is an unknown risk associated with Melksham and a desire that we are not disadvantaged for another clubs wrong doing. Edit: spelling

Reading speculation multiple times does not make it fact.

Woops!

I don't think that Sydney could afford to get rid of Franklin. I imagine they would have to subsidise his pay for 8 years? And that would remain in their salary cap. No one else would match Franklin's Sydney contract on damaged goods. I'm with you Beeb, pass on Franklin. I would take Tippet or Reid.

With the WADA potential problem any draft choice we offer should be for the 2016 draft subject to WADA penalty. We offer nothing for Melksham this year and if he is not penalised EFC get our 2nd pick 2016.

What is wrong with your patients are they sick? Tell me soon as or you will test my patience.

Over reaction by many here. 1 If any trade is offered I would be surprised if the club did not have a WADA clause (Not Santa) ie. EFC to pay all his wages during any period of penalty to be included in their cap. 2 MFC would not offer much maybe 3rd rounder or into PSD 3 No deals are done yet, so chill.

Who is ill?

Is that some weird instruction for BBO? Tooth brushes red leg, then tongue tickles inner thigh.

Maybe Paul Roos would like to trade supporter base. We are far too negative. Try dishing up the last few weeks to Richmond, Collingwood, Carlton, Essendon, Hawthorn, Adelaide, Port Adelaide, WestCoast supporters. Your head would be on a stick. Blame the supporters all you like, we haven't failed the club because we are still paying membership. What about you? Would you be happy to show the last 3 weeks of MFC games as the mark you have left on football? The insipid performances of the players the last 3 weeks is a direct result of Paul Roos not the supporters. Man up, make the tough decisions show some god damn spine, and then the players might. Until then the supporters keep this club going and don't you forget it.