Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I was going to post this in the 'Best in 50 years' thread, but I thought it deserved it's own discussion.

Here's an interesting stat:

AFL Ladder                              Inside 50 Differential Ranking

1) Port Adelaide                       1) Port Adelaide

2) Brisbane                               2) Brisbane

3) Collingwood                        3) Collingwood

4) Richmond                            4) Melbourne

5) Geelong                               5) Richmond

6) St Kilda                                6) Geelong

 

Our forwardline/ midfield connection has been woeful bar the last 2 weeks and has been discussed to death. However, I think those issues have masked just how good we've been in other key areas. Many have rightly pointed out that winning the 'territory battle' in the middle is pointless if your midfielders can't deliver to your forwards. Not exactly groundbreaking news, and Blind Freddy could see that this was the key reason we were getting belted in the early rounds of the year. But it's also a relatively minor problem - clearly, generating more forwardline entries than your opposition is strongly correlated with winning games of footy. We've been doing a hell of a lot right, and in this key area we're mixing it with the best teams in the league - we're 90% of the way to being a bloody good side and premiership contender. The last 2 weeks have been highly encouraging, and it looks as though we might finally be sorting out our issues up forward (albeit against terrible opposition). If we can continue to improve in that area, we'll be charging up the ladder very quickly. Some cause for optimism (always easier after a win).

Go Dees.

 

 

And with a game in hand.

We just really need to capitalise on every game we dominate out of the middle. With the shortened season, we can't have repeats of the two H&A losses to Geelong in 2018 this year. 

Given we've got Brisbane this week, a win there will really tell us a lot about where we're at. 

I think the key in this statistic is "differential".

We all know we get a stack of inside 50s. When we're bad, we know we don't score from them.

But this stat shows that, in addition to getting it inside our 50, we also restrict our opponents from getting it inside their 50. 

We've seen our defensive zone holding up really well over the last month. When we limit our turnovers, we are defending the ground much better and, as a result, the ball is spending more time closer to our goal than our opponents. The fact that the other 5 teams in the top 6 for this stat are top sides on the ladder shows that is a common trend amongst strong sides, so there is a foundation there.

Of course, it doesn't matter if we can't score (e.g. vs Geelong) or if we turn it over and let our opponent find an easy way home when they go inside 50 (e.g. vs Richmond).

 
3 hours ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

 

 

Our forwardline/ midfield connection has been woeful bar the last 2 weeks and has been discussed to death. However, I think those issues have masked just how good we've been in other key areas. Many have rightly pointed out that winning the 'territory battle' in the middle is pointless if your midfielders can't deliver to your forwards. Not exactly groundbreaking news, and Blind Freddy could see that this was the key reason we were getting belted in the early rounds of the year. But it's also a relatively minor problem - clearly, generating more forwardline entries than your opposition is strongly correlated with winning games of footy. We've been doing a hell of a lot right, and in this key area we're mixing it with the best teams in the league - we're 90% of the way to being a bloody good side and premiership contender. The last 2 weeks have been highly encouraging, and it looks as though we might finally be sorting out our issues up forward (albeit against terrible opposition). If we can continue to improve in that area, we'll be charging up the ladder very quickly. Some cause for optimism (always easier after a win).

Go Dees.

 

With respect, No .... No its not.

It is a huge problem for us, and has been for a long time. Even Goodwin could have fixed it by now if it was only a relatively minor problem.

The last 2 games have given the impression that we might have overcome the issue, but G.C. was hardly a walkover. We struggled to stay in front all day, and only drew away VERY late in the game. On the other hand, the Hawks game was some of the best footy i have seen us play in many years.

Yes, if you look at the stats (And thanks for posting them) we have one part of the problem seemingly in hand. You wont score much if you dont go I-50 often, and that is something MFC do extremely well. We just have to figure out what to do when the ball crosses over that curved line.

I hope you are right ofc, we all want to see the Dees start converting our chances as well as the best because when we do MFC are the real deal.

I remain far from convinced though and will only change my mind when we can regularly beat good teams and not just fellow stragglers.

 

  • Author
59 minutes ago, ding said:

With respect, No .... No its not.

It is a huge problem for us, and has been for a long time.

Perhaps a poor choice of words on my part - I agree that it's a massive problem (last 2 weeks notwithstanding), and not necessarily an easy thing to fix. My point is that this major, very identifiable problem makes it hard to see the things we've been doing well all year. Across the rest of the ground, we aren't just competitive - we're right up there with the best in the comp. If/ when we can sort out the forwardline (and recent signs are encouraging), I think there's some strong evidence that we could be knocking on the door of the top 4 very quickly.

The forwardline might not be an easy thing to fix, but it's a damn sight easier than fixing glaring weaknesses across the ground, which has been the underlying theme of our team for most of the last 2 decades.

Time will tell. Brisbane will be a good test.


2 hours ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

Perhaps a poor choice of words on my part - I agree that it's a massive problem (last 2 weeks notwithstanding), and not necessarily an easy thing to fix. My point is that this major, very identifiable problem makes it hard to see the things we've been doing well all year. Across the rest of the ground, we aren't just competitive - we're right up there with the best in the comp. If/ when we can sort out the forwardline (and recent signs are encouraging), I think there's some strong evidence that we could be knocking on the door of the top 4 very quickly.

The forwardline might not be an easy thing to fix, but it's a damn sight easier than fixing glaring weaknesses across the ground, which has been the underlying theme of our team for most of the last 2 decades.

Time will tell. Brisbane will be a good test.

Couldnt agree more.

  • 8 months later...
  • Author

Bump.

Only 4 rounds into 2021, but so far:

AFL Ladder                              Inside 50 Differential Ranking

1) Bulldogs                              1) Bulldogs

2) Melbourne                          2) Melbourne

3) Sydney                                3) Port Adelaide

4) Port Adelaide                    4) Swans

 

Above all else, the territory battle is what decides games. The fact that we are beginning to capitalize on our midfield dominance, despite missing our best 2 key position forwards is immensely encouraging.

leading the comp for tackling and tackles inside 50 helps too. we are last for disposal efficiency, amazingly...

 
16 minutes ago, Allen Jakovich said:

leading the comp for tackling and tackles inside 50 helps too. we are last for disposal efficiency, amazingly...

Yep harks back in some ways to 2018 plenty of grunt but just lack8ng polish! If this improves..... look out

  • Author
10 hours ago, Allen Jakovich said:

leading the comp for tackling and tackles inside 50 helps too. we are last for disposal efficiency, amazingly...

Yep - no doubt that's our biggest area of improvement. Our forwardline is effectively laying twice as many tackles as last year - even allowing for the longer quarters, that is huge. 

Tackles per game:

  2020 2021
TMac 1.7 3.2
Kosi 2.5 3.8
ANB 2.3 3.8
Spargo 1.5 4.5
Fritsch 1.1 2
LJ 1.3 1.8

 

The disposal efficiency stat is pretty misleading though. On the weekend we went at 63.8%; Geelong went at 69.3%. 

Disposal efficiency is always going to be much lower in the attacking half of the ground. Don't read too much into it.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 372 replies