Jump to content

The turnaround that's taken me by surprise

Featured Replies

I'm just happy to be enjoying watching Melbourne play again, I have belief in this club again.

Edited by ILLDieADemon

 

Amazingly, Melbourne and Richmond have the same win/loss record, with Richmond having a better percentage. Just goes to show that the true story goes a lot deeper than raw stats.

And it's not just patronising because we've been so bad for so long. It's actually recognition that the game we play is genuinely promising for greater things hopefully in the not too distant future.

As shultz said , we are alot better than our position on the ladder.

 

I think those instructions are greatly exaggerated. There were only two danger games that year. At it's worst I don't think it would have been more than those two games and one of them was lost after the siren, the other was lost well before the siren but probably would have been lost anyway.

Could not agree more, though irrelevant to this thread. How one can be accused of deliberately losing a game that was only lost due to a great long shot at goal, after the siren - still bemuses me and adds to my paranoia that this was all an AFL set up. (Must take my next pill).

I am not surprised by the improvement however after years of getting kicked in the guts I didnt allow myself to believe it was actually going to start to happen under Roos.

Having said that - Two thing I am delighted about

1/ The raging debate regarding drafting v development - I have never believed we could be THAT bad at drafting - give players a modicum of tuition/structure/clear messages and a heap of confidence and look what can be accomplished in such a short time. More than ever I am convinced that this has been the ultimate failing for so many years. Who know whether the draftees had talent - what I do know is we haven't developed the players we have drafted.

2/ I argued with a mate about Roos stance - forget the scoreboard - just play your role as instructed. My mate insisted that the scoreboard should always be paramount. Roos message is clear - lay 80 tackles a game, stick to your structures, concentrate on defense, win contested possession and kick straight - do all these you are going to win more games than you are going to lose - the scoreboard will then generally take care of itself.

Edited by nutbean


I am not surprised by the improvement however after years of getting kicked in the guts I didnt allow myself to believe it was actually going to start to happen under Roos.

Having said that - Two thing I am delighted about

1/ The raging debate regarding drafting v development - I have never believed we could be THAT bad at drafting - give players a modicum of tuition/structure/clear messages and a heap of confidence and look what can be accomplished in such a short time. More than ever I am convinced that this has been the ultimate failing for so many years. Who know whether the draftees had talent - what I do know is we haven't developed the players we have drafted.

This will be a raging debate forever about the last 7yrs at MFC. Travis J went to Lions and Leigh Matthews couldn't get him to fulfill his talent. Gysberts went to Nth and couldn't get a game. Morton went to West Coast and couldnt cut it there but Bennell could. Moloney went to Lions and can't get a game. Sylvia went to Freo and can't get a game. Strauss, Blease, Tapscott can't get a game under Paul Roos. Dunn, Watts, Jetta, Pedersen etc etc etc are getting games and transforming under Roos. That all tells me that it's more to do with the players than the development. They were all coached under different systems. I would suggest the ones who were dudds stayed dudds and the one's who weren't have prospered under proper development.

2/ I argued with a mate about Roos stance - forget the scoreboard - just play your role as instructed. My mate insisted that the scoreboard should always be paramount. Roos message is clear - lay 80 tackles a game, stick to your structures, concentrate on defense, win contested possession and kick straight - do all these you are going to win more games than you are going to lose - the scoreboard will then generally take care of itself.

I'm with Roosy. Scoreboard is only relevant if you aren't motivated and need to try harder because of the scoreboard. If you need that for motivation you should go somewhere else.

I'm just happy to be enjoying watching Melbourne play again, I have belief in this club again.

Nicely summed up. This Roos fella certainly knows what he's doing.

To further illustrate the turn around, here is the % differential from the end of 2013. We sit second only to Port.

Team % Diff.

PORT 41.55

MEL 24.63

WCE 22.62

GWS 19.63

GCS 15.77

HAW 11.98

SYD 6.83

COLL 3.61

ESS -2.05

ADE -2.32

WB -3.35

NM -8.93

FREO -12.36

ST K -18.39

CARL -19.38

RICH -26.01

BRIS -30.45

GEE -34.34

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

    • 7 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

    • 83 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 483 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 27 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

    • 566 replies