Our warchest looks like it may go to lawyers rather then players

Well, at least the lawyers would have earned it...

The club has no obligation to report on it. Only once decisions and/or sanctions have been made should the club report on it.

Dumb threat is dumb.

One thing I haven't heard mentioned anywhere yet, amazingly really, is where in the AFL rulebook does it say that a team MUST attempt to win every game of football or suffer sanctions?

One thing I haven't heard mentioned anywhere yet, amazingly really, is where in the AFL rulebook does it say that a team MUST attempt to win every game of football or suffer sanctions?

My understanding is it would fall into the 'bringing the game into disrepute' category'.

Really it's enough of a joke in itself that one bad thing falls in the category and another doesn't completely at the discretion of Vlad and is a true portrayal of how flawed our games hierarchy is.

Thanks for the comments one and all! Some very sage advice! How do i now close the thread?

Leave it alone & it will slowly sink into the deep abyss..........

so you don't think they leak

even if they haven't said anything of interest there is certainly an afl trial going on

really not sure - whilst there maybe an individual leaking I still feel that AFL would love this to all go away but the media refuses to stop beating the drums. Whilst people have rightly commented that just because others before us "list managed" it doesnt make it right for us to do the same, I think the AFL would be worried that if they come down with an ugly finding against us, then they are obliged to look closely at past actions of other clubs.