Jump to content

Charlie Gardiner.. any interest?

Featured Replies

 
tbh I don't get the point you're trying to make either

I agree, I can't see Rhino's point, plus it's factually incorrect. Davey and Martin nominated for the national draft but were overlooked. And I would have thought that Davey has cemented an AFL career.

I agree, I can't see Rhino's point, plus it's factually incorrect. Davey and Martin nominated for the national draft but were overlooked. And I would have thought that Davey has cemented an AFL career.

Missed the point and nitpick. Par for the course isnt Mo?

 

This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

I haven't read them all, but I will suggest that whether Gardiner is better than 3 or 4 or 8 current Melbourne players is not of concern to me. What is of concern is making sure Melbourne either used the first pick in the preseason draft on a player who may legitimately aid us in our premiership quest, or pass and have filled our list via the national draft. Using the pick on a guy who has been rejected by 2 clubs, is clearly not up to it and wouldn't be part of our best 22 is a complete waste of everybody's time and would be another list management calamity. Gardiner being better than players like Bartram isn't a reason put them both on the list, it's a blatant hint that neither of them should be on there.


This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

It stopped being about Gardiner awhile ago and has been turned into another excuse for Freak and co. to malign one of our own.

I'm still asuming that it is a "no" on Gardiner though?

This is pure gold. I can't believe I'm contributing post #54 on Charlie freakin' Gardiner.

That in itself is pure gold pantaloons. :lol: Who would of thought?

I haven't read them all, but I will suggest that whether Gardiner is better than 3 or 4 or 8 current Melbourne players is not of concern to me. What is of concern is making sure Melbourne either used the first pick in the preseason draft on a player who may legitimately aid us in our premiership quest, or pass and have filled our list via the national draft. Using the pick on a guy who has been rejected by 2 clubs, is clearly not up to it and wouldn't be part of our best 22 is a complete waste of everybody's time and would be another list management calamity.

Gardiner being better than players like Bartram isn't a reason put them both on the list, it's a blatant hint that neither of them should be on there.

Quite right Pantaloons, and as you say Gardiner would clearly not legitimately aid us in our premiership quest after being rejected by not 1 club, but two clubs.

Why some 'people' are even contemplating Gardiner is bizarre, given their thoughts prior to trade week, demanding more picks and upgrading of picks. I would've thought they would rather fill our list via the national draft than have Charlie "freakin" Gardiner! :wacko:

Are you in cheer squad HT??

What the Charlie Gardiner cheer squad?...No Goose. You should know that because it seems there is only two members...and you're one of them.

the freak is all over you and you can just tell by your tone HT that your only a little boy!!

........

:wacko: I hope for your sake, you can interpret this quote of yours....because I can't decipher this for the life of me! :wacko:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

    • 33 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 194 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 8 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 24 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Like
    • 763 replies
  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

    • 2 replies