Straight Sets Simon

I second that.

My bad. I was going to mention that, but I ran out of time and had to get to uni. Sorry to cause any confusion.

Are we likely to see Jamar back in Melbourne colours this year? (Assuming White and Johnson don't get injured.)

You've definatley started something.

Just having a laugh.

They are excuses that they are using to justify their mediocre performances with.

Cheers.

What did he say?

Can we just put our players who play best when forward in the forward line and kick the ball down to them quickly?

I would like the MFC to continually have a forward line to kick it to so that they don't have to hold the ball up in the first place.

There is no excuse. It's just that “footy sucks sometimes” remember?

Shorter, less experiences, poorer judgement and awareness, has played little football in defense.

Just out of interest, is Frawley in there because you think he is the best option for the rest of this year, or more for giving him experience? Like Bizzell does?

I understand that you don't rate Bizzell. But who would you prefer to see in the team instead of him?

2004 - good until injured. 2005 - good then faded away at the end and was unlucky to be dropped. 2006 - broken leg

I'll s-p-e-l-l it out for you. diesel said "Great game by Bizz. Courageous as ever and should stay in at least until Rivers is fit and up and playing well". That's one example of the many times on this site where people say that either one of Rivers of Bizzell should be in the team as they play the same / a similar role. I was disputing that claim.

I haven't seen the game in full, but the general consensus around the place is that Bizzell was one of the best players. Would you agree with that? Or is any good performance just "satisfactory"?

FFS. I said: "I don't see why Bizzell and Rivers can't be in the same team together". You said "They aren't competing for the same position". The reason I said the first line was that there are people who seem to think Rivers and Bizzell are competing. I don't think they are, hence my first line. But you started rabbiting on about Rivers not being used to Jones etc as if you were trying to prove me wrong. You just assumed that whatever I write you must disagree with, when actually we agree that they are not competing for the same spot.

I'm not saying that they are competing for the same spot...

A lot of people seem to think they are.

Except to all those who constantly bag him, saying he is too old, too slow etc.

I don't see why Bizzell and Rivers can't be in the same team together.

I only saw bits and pieces of the game but I'm shocked to hear that Bizzell played well...

I though that the James McDonald decision last week was the right one. Momentum or no momentum, he pushed him in the back.

I'd like to see CJ in for Miller. I would like to see Newton playing even more. Let Dunn play at CHF and also give the bench some legs. I'm happy that Bizzell is playing... Just in case no one noticed.