Satyriconhome
Members-
Posts
7,886 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
71
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Satyriconhome
-
Blease - hasn't played for 2 weeks coming off a poor game, snowball in hell's chance..........sorry rephrase that, think he played in praccy game against Sandringham last Friday, believe Casey beaten again...so probably still snowball Edit praccy game
-
I am afraid they did, they pick up content from a few places, but it is only the MFC media team who can post to MFC site
-
No, I was a member of a group, which I have put at least five times, explained previously, don't need acceptance by any group to feel fulfilled, you grow out of it, well some do, trying to stop posters like yourself from putting incorrect information, why the need to name call, rather childish It was exactly what Schwab asked for, er let's guess the CEO and Board
-
No you are not reading it right, read what I wrote, we were asked for feedback, assume Schwab removed the bits most didn't like then passed on the brief of what HE WANTED, to the agency, which was also responsible for the hideous red V, the Barcelona emblem reflects the history of the Club, same as MFC
-
No it was produced and we were asked our opinion, I personally like Barcelona's on which it was based, so I was ok with it, but it had a couple of things most of us didn't like and they disappeared, it was replacing that hideous red V thing, so most asked were glad to see the back of it and probably agreed the emblem was good. I personally think it wouldn't have mattered if everybody disliked it, Schwab would have gone ahead anyway. But at the moment personally I think it looks good, I don't want it replaced with a bloody cartoon demon, we have gone past that
-
I didn't give my feedback to the designer, I gave it to the Club, so you are wrong again, I am not defending the Club, your opinion is that it is outdated, too busy and could work better, I don't agree....horror upon horror but then again I think Barcelona's design upon which it is based is one of the best in Europe, each to their own Any commercial design enterprise can turn down a brief, or they can accept it and then whinge about it, classy
-
I think unfortunately that Tyson may get to know Macaffer better than he wants to, I reckon Cross will go with Pendlebury and Jones N with Beams, leaving Vince to mop up
-
What do we do with Grimes?
Satyriconhome replied to blue and red in the head's topic in Melbourne Demons
No that was outstanding, and deserves to be lauded, but the defenders of Grimes (myself included) have seen him put his body on the line on numerous occasions, the marshalling of the defence, the leadership he displays at training, he is actually playing game after game himself for a change, it is not surprise that the defence as a unit has gone up a level again -
what...and they let you live....Scousers must be mellowing!!!!
-
You used it to launch an attack and justify your opinion on the emblem, so therefore I have the right to reply, it is quite simple, as I said in a previous post I was asked for my opinion on an earlier version before it went into production, a few of us were, we gave some input and it was listened to, what the Club got was exactly what it asked for, not as you say a messy conflicted brief. If you friend is not the designer, then how do you know it was as you described
-
Yes but I support the People's Club,once a Blue always a Blue (I remember somebody from the Scully school of loyalty saying that once), you do know Suarez is about to leave again I reckon Gerrard slipped (fell) coz he thought somebody was going to throw a punch at him, tried that one on my never missed a game in the KOP for over 50 years brother, not impressed No, I just prefer classy, which the emblem is now, can appreciate people would like a change but let's spend the money on the FD, unless one of our graphic designers on here is willing to offer up the work for nothing
-
Oh right, so she was a designer given a brief which she didn't like, she could have turned it down......commercial decision?
-
http://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/2014-05-31/angry-jamars-freshair-swing Why not post it, good on the Club I say
-
This is what Riewoldt was talking about today, we all know we have a good coach, was this bit necessary, feel like a man now do you, tell you what I'll tell you where Neeld is now working, go and say it to his face hero
-
If we let their midfield and runners give Cloke siliver service laces out, it won't matter who is on him, will back Tommy Mc if it goes to ground, we managed Schultz ok without the good service coming in
-
Nice, the couple of artists we have on here are working feverishly as we speak, it's probably already posted as I am typing this
-
No to pay a design agency, I was one of a small select group who was shown a prototype of the emblem by the said Mr Schwab, there were actually a couple of changes put in place, if you would like to see the inspiration behind the emblem ....tried to paste it wouldn't work...look up Barcelona Football Club emblem
-
You've obviously never played a round at St Andrews It's an emblem, it says to me MFC, that's all it is supposed to say, what do you want something Americanised, it asks you how you are and how your are feeling
-
What do we do with Grimes?
Satyriconhome replied to blue and red in the head's topic in Melbourne Demons
Are you sure that's not the wine speaking? -
The team on the park reflects where we want to go, not an emblem, the emblem was introduced to replace that horrid modern red V and blue abomination, want to go back to that?......I do not want a Demon anywhere near the emblem/badge/brand....it is Americanised, cartoonish and childish
-
I only have a go at certain posters who add nothing (in my opinion) to topics apart from getting a rise under their desks
-
Here is a challenge for you, I think you may be up to it..just...try posting something to do with the topic rather than taking potshots at other posters, go on I dare you, poke your head above the parapet with an opinion on the game from Saturday and then engage in some debate, that is if by a strange quirk, you may find other posters don't agree with you
-
I know it is a discussion forum and people vent, yet you have just criticised me above for doing so, bit contradictory wouldn't you say, and as for the Club not heeding to anything they post, try telling WYL that
-
Give it a rest, you are joining that select group on here who deliberately misquote to make a point. Try going back and reading some of my posts, last year the point I was making was it didn't matter how much sanctimonious bleating was going on on this site, it mattered little, as most of the heroes on here who sit behind the anonymity of their keyboards taking potshots at everything and everybody, to try and make themselves relevant, have no impact whatsoever on the direction or the decisions the Club makes or takes (We have even have CFB this morning critiquing my posting grammer and punctuation, how relevant) Of course I knew there were issues, but some of the 'issues' quoted as being 'issues' on here were in fact as far from the truth as you could get There are a handful on here who actually get quite a bit of inside information, but have to be careful what they write, as they are under certain constraints Going back on topic, with the Club hopefully heading in the right direction, the hairshirt wearing, hindsight gurus will have less and less to bleat about
-
You mean different from where he usually has his head.......