PaulRB

Is there an issue between May and McVee?

This would be close to the mark as reasonable, should Trac wants to go to GC.

I think you’re confusing me with someone who said Trac wants to leave.

Can we just send him to Essendon..? They’ve heaps of high picks (possibly 3 top 10) and will have a Merrit sized hole in their midfield to fill. Off to the Dons if he wants to leave. 😉

Have King and Cam Bruce crossed paths coaching-wise? Saw Cam on post game for Brissie. A candidate?

Pies get beat by 29 points, and one free reversed would have saved them… What are those stages of grief?

This...

My suspicion as to why Steven May has been told to look elsewhere, is that he was a recalcitrant when it came to embracing Goodies new ‘modern’ gameplay. And with King coming in to implement a similar version Stevie’s been told to shape up or ship out..?

Nathan may have picked wrong... https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/blow-for-devils-planning-commission-says-no-to-hobart-stadium-20250917-p5mvp5.html 😂

Cox!

I really want the Pies to go out in straight set. Go Demons!

AFL hypocrisy at its worst… https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2017/jun/21/snoop-dogg-homophobia-young-thug-moment-i-feared

What role is Cam Bruce playing at Brissie?

On the leaking angle, first person Goodwin called after Green and the board possie had finished giving him the news, was his manager... my total speculation is it's the managers, the confidants of players, coaches and the media are the source of most "leaks" in the footy ecosystem. Information is valuable, so gaining credits with Caro or Morris by leaking Goodwin's sacking leads is part of grooming Caro or Morris so that when managers want to influence the market for their players (i.e. do their jobs during contract negotiations) then their mates in the media will be amenable...

You project too much nsc. How many of the things you say about Kade are actually true of you?

Technically they can.

Beg to differ TU. If we lose to Dogs and Hawks (and several other results go our way), our final match will by for the Pies playing finals (assuming Crows beat them next week)… Hoolly doolly wouldn’t that be juicy.

Is there a slim possibility that the Pies are playing for a spot in the 8 come our final game vs them..? Please 🙏

I assume we’re running a competitive process where senior coach will present their assessment of the list, vision for their tenure, their team, etc… Is it clear who from the MFC will be conducting interviews and making the BIG decision?

Lots to like against a poor opposition. Like Windsor in the middle. It’s never bad to win by 10+

Well put and timely. When i saw the title I asked myself what would I like from the MFC? My immediate answer is active and engaged transparency (with embargos on inter-club competetive issues of footy) and communications by the club about the thoughts, theories, plans and ambitions of the MFC leaders (Board, Football Department, and Team) and their evaluation of our current state and how WE can fix it. So I was happy when I saw both "transparency" and "communication" in Dks agenda. Constructive, intelligent discussion of a problem and its immediate resolution... what could go wrong? 😉 Go Dees.

I think that the injury toll and exhaustion to the team, evident in the fails of 22 and 23 as injuries took their toll, means that the " contested territory" game is not a sustainable strategy. plus our lack of dominant tall forwards means we were working hard but unable to register scores that reflect this dominance.

Given this, isn't Evans also responsible for the clash, and should also be getting a three week ban?