binman

Omac will get first crack at buddie. If he is killing him frosty gets next crack. But buddy is not the key to this game. It is the medium to small forwards who have troubled us thisvseason, hawkins bag of 6 notwithstanding. Swans need 100 points to beat us. Dees will happily give buddy 5-6 goals if they are not fonding goals elsewhere.

Is dee tales the podcast that was with sen? If si i cant find it on their website or app this season

The Band. Truly one the great bands. In terms of synergy few come close - from that era perhaps only the Who and early Beatles

Shouldn't it be Clarry thst weight?

Whoever it was there are two likely dl responses. 1. Omac was on him 2. Small defenders get a free pass. It is only kpds that are heldcaccoubtable for forwards kicking bags.

Coaches cleary disagree

Disagree. A double chance has to increase chance of winning the gf. For a start we could beat ?

Total match points, which was 155.5. A bet that in previous years have done pretty well wirh and was my main footy betting option. But very few this season because unlike last few years has been super variable. Though if you had taken unders every game you would be well up.

Fortunately my mate disagreed with my tigers line bet. But agreed with the tmp bet. So a good win.

Exactly. What a ridiculous comment. Revealing though. The world cup is a tournament not a football season. Is rhat how rhey see aflw?

My best bets for this round of footy Richmond to make their line of 15.5 Comments: The Total Match Point (TMP) line is only 155.5 which is the only reason i can see for the line being at 15.5. At the G the tigers are a 5 goal better side than the cats and if there is some rain about (which is why the TMP is so low) it will help the Tigers as rain suits their hyper pressure style and conversely hurts the Cats as it will negate Hawkins. So a line of 15.5 is terrific value. By the by the forecast is for showers to clear so 155.5 TMP is pretty low, though it is bound to be a high pressure affair. Roos to make their line of -2.5 Comments: Yes Higgins is out, which is a big blow and it is Lions home game but i cannot believe Lions are starting favorites in this match. North are pushing for finals and a loss would really hurt them. Surely the Roos have the greater motivation. I will add however that my mate who i bet with has send his weekly email with his best bets and has the lions as one of them! So we will be trying to convince each other the other is wrong.

Six games? So some clubs dont play orher clubs? How the final ladder be in any way fair or an accurate representation of each teams true strength? Say geelong is crap but we dont get tp play them and miss our on percentage. What a sham. Daisy is spot on. Has to be each clubs plays each other once, so a nine game season. Top 4 for finals. Top 2 get a second chance.

When he came on in his first vfl game hw was frightening in his attack on the ball and tackling. Have to feel sorry for the sun's defenders who probaly all have staying injury free for their trip to bali om their minds. Good selection from this perspective as vb will role model rge required intensity.

Just saw this post (honest). My thoughts exactly (see above)

Yep, no chance either of them get dropped. I suspect they might bring Kent in for Spargo. He has been terrific Spargo but is young and they might want an older, hardened forward for finals and if they are thinking Kent they will want to get some games into him. I wonder also if Hunt might be some chance to come in for Smith? Probably not as not like for like, they will want to reward players for winning, if Kent comes in that's already two changes and he is improving each week. Super athletic and plays tall. I've convinced myself. He stays

Finals. We will make them. I'm already thinking of dr d's new avatar

Nup. In this instance she doesn't know what she is talking about. She doesn't have the dees making the GF!

Only four of those blokes know what they are talking about. And even they only get it half right.

Last Friday, just before the bombers game. I actually suggested the bet on a DL thread and advised if keen people should get on before the ess game as if they were to lose would come into about 1.80. I was pretty close!

A long time DZ. They do not have the pace to hurt us on the outside and we have them covered on contested ball, which is really the cornerstone of their 'brand 'and has been for many years. That said 1.45 is short. But as we both know the odds are perhaps the most reliable indicator of the relative chances in any given game.

That all i want. Or else what is the point? For example i might say i have it on good authority Tmac has done his foot again. And leave it at that.

Good lord, live and die?

I'm sure i saw Hogan flick one back to Oliver who goaled against the dogs

I've joked about posting such comments without any indication of the source (even vague ones) that give readers some capacity to make an assessment of the reliability of the information is against the DL code of conduct. But perhaps those jokes were a little passive aggressive So i'm going to change tack. If you are going to post comments as serious in implication as this include a [censored] source!!!!!

Something along the lines that he would NEVER make a forward....