Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Recruiting Tom [big tick], or 'moving on' Junior[big cross]?
  2. ...by 187 points :-)
  3. Sounds as if he has his head screwed on straight, and really wants to play AFL with MFC Well done
  4. DeeGee - YOU are asking that? I thought that you would know the answer. monoCcular LOL I seem to remember someone recently at the club talking up 'being the hardest team to play against'......did he speak too soon? Bail certainly will have his work cut out to get in the team, but every team does need depth players Tathra....on the coast at Bega, as I recall And I will have to use the Yass Road one on my friends from Canberra. Yes, vandenBerg certainly looks at this stage like a huge find. Balanced, strong, tall, intelligent. Hope he can keep it up once he is better known by oppositions.
  5. Many posters on this thread sem to have not read the headr - it has been hijacked as a McCartin thread.
  6. Please remind me how many games Jeremy played as a forward this year?
  7. The 'photos' McKenzie and Evans have are their contracts
  8. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ah...such a happy place for someone prone to depression to want to move to.
  9. It was surely, in effect, Salam plus Tyson over Kelly, just to put it into true perspective. Do you honestly think that Kelly, in our side, would be burning them up this year?
  10. Q: What colour will the sky be on Sunday afternoon? A: Who cares, we won't see it playing at Doglands.
  11. How come we are stuck with this underscheiving blue sky that will never get us anywhere, when we should obviously have taken that fantastic teal sky that is exciting all those lucky Port Adelaide fans. What a shocking choice.
  12. IIRC we lost one last September - final game of the season.
  13. Fabulous post But Mr Roos, aided by Mr Jackson, and maybe a few players, will inevitably bring us all unprecedented joy and success within twelve months. Without a shadow of doubt.
  14. monoccular replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hopefully Jimmy T could develop to fill this rôle in time. Some have had Blease here, though he lacks something, probably related to intensity and / or concentration.
  15. monoccular replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    IF not fully fit then rest him. Have another look at Georgiou, who was going pretty well until "friendly fire" from JV KOd him. I am more concerned by some of his decision making. He has a huge tank and puts in every time....hope it can improve. I am worried about him, though not like you, over him.
  16. Are you implying that you wouldn't take Dawes, Salem....or Judd, Ball, Goddard, Richards, Rioli (though not the stereotype), the Scotts, Hawkins etc ???
  17. "A solid source inside the recruiting office?"
  18. provided his name doesn't start with $. :-)
  19. Certainly looks as if we have snagged a couple of absolute rippers this time. Congrats to the recruiting team.
  20. What a great article. I haven't read many or maybe any of Murphy's articles before but I will now. Well written. Does anyone know if it is all his own work or is it ghosted.
  21. monoccular replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    and only one season since our last flag....how many would have dreamed in their worst nightmares that we would be still waiting? Hard to believe that our last winning GF tickets cost probably about 8 shillings and sixpence !!
  22. Yeah. I look forward to either one striving to be better than the other, not in a one upmanship sense but I think they will push each other to greater and greater heights. . I couldn't help noticing JKH and to a slightly lesser extent Salem doing this too, especially early in the Crows game. Very poised. Both look to have what Alan Jeans once (was reputed to have) said when asked what attribute he looks for most in a young player - balance !!
  23. monoccular replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There were certainly a lot more Amps today, which, multiplied by the Volts (= well known potential), meant a lot more output of energy = Watts. Now he needs to back it up again and again.
  24. monoccular replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Do you mean banished from the game in disgrace??