jayceebee31

Well if this is the case- state whom do you feel we should get or the type of player we require in your opinion.We have 10 picks overall-I think. Just for the record- In the mix,I think at least two talls, a HBF, Wingman type should be very highly considered.And a possible forward/ruckman type in the rookie list.Your opinion I'd appreciate.

It would not worry me too much if we picked him up as a part time defence coach.

I think you maybe correct re your first part re Bail & Garland but Coljoy- don't know about that-however with Bruce gone ,this is the year to dominate

Read the article myself and thought bang on- great article from an unknown.

Good words of wisdom

So - or therefore how do we get around this -as he has definately been training with us ?

Preference for Neagle over Anthony.Your kidding or just a fool.

The major issue with Hahn was money.They just couldn't fit him in under the salary cap.

This was done to a large degree with the trip to China.At least something to build upon.The recent loss of senior players will come around.It takes time.

I agree with your point of view-also his adaptability thus flexibility is also another factor along with experience.

There is no doubt in my mind that the FD are trying to develop a culture and in it a climate that everyone is playing for their spot and if the FD does not feel you warrant being on the list- they will turn you over- however IMO- doing this to Bruce & Junior is going a little too far- but we will never know the exact situation that happened.

Suggest you ask the store.

What Gooner has pointed out really makes BP & the recruiting staff task very diddicult.It will be very interesting whom we pick- but I believe some experienced players will be in the mix at least.IMO at least two of the five will be experienced footballers either from the AFL or other leagues.I might add- I thought with Bruce leaving we now have 5 picks in the National draft & 5 rookie picks. I understand we may only take 4 picks in the National leaving a pick in the PRE SEASON DRAFT- Am I correct or wrong again?

I agree totally- we should in my opinion draft at least 4 talls from our 10 picks. Please do not forget to let me know whilst absent.

I get your point- the answer is a strong NO- for the debt demolition.It has been demolished. However- we may start a new one say- The Development Fund.

And the timing to allow us to develop another couple of talls.

However note,the foil has kicked 50 goals in a year. Pretty good foil I think.However, I feel Petterd and Jurrah, both have the ability no doubt of kicking at least that in a season as well. It would allow a very penetrating forward line which opposition coaches would have a nightmare with. We know doubt will recruit at least one more tall to develop as well.

I believe we can achieve both finals whilst gaining pertinant experience.

I agree-consideration all round. And this is called a partnership. Now your problem.The Dees will make the eight. I think they can win at least 12 games.If this is so- Saturday would look most likely the day they will play.Therefore Friday would be the most suitable timeslot for the 21st.But what about - your head. Will you have a hangover. Would you be ok for an after lunch game.Maybe - have the party on Sunday night- safest bet for all.

Can't argue with that.

I wonder whether we would consider playing him in a leadership role with Casey? Any thoughts?

Overall they look great- Green & Chips not there-Who else was missing? Please advise.

As a leading tall forward- definately worth looking at. May even be a geat foil for the likes of Jurrah,Petterd etc.. Just maybe the one. Please note I am very disappointed re Bruce.

Hey- don't tell me your memory is fading- getting to old that's your problem...

We are discussing pick 12-not likely that either Gaff or Day would be there.We certainly would take either if they were there-however, IMO- Darling would be the best of the three anyhow as the list is..