jayceebee31

No issue towards happiness.JA has agreed that rules will be brought in for 2012- that is what wanted.I accept Scarlett not trading- I think that is fair and HT - my GRAND FINAL COMES UP NEXT WEEK AGAINST YOU.Especially after getting belted this week.And please note I strongly suggest Scarlett plays and plays to WIN every match for the rest of the year.I genuinely believe he can make the 8, even from here,and be a geniune threat in the finals.He has a strong list now and is coaching very well. I hope he does trade -as long as it improves his team - thus trying to belt everyone like he has me this round for the remainder.So go for it Scarlett.

Tappy played well- but showed he was short of a gallop. Most likely will get promoted but may even play for Casey next week, if they haven't got a bye. Then he would be primed for the MFC to play next up.

No issue disagreeing with me WJ - Maric doesn't get the ball enough and never ever crumbs for the ball. Had great opportunities today but was sorely missed. Also sometimes selfish - looks after own interest except the teams.

And I sincerely agree with you regarding --Ultimate footy has been great, but better now that I have learnt from HT about proposing to trade.Very much looking forward to playing for a long, long time.Rivetting stuff.But, I look forward to playing in fair rules for all.

Thanks JA- THAT'S ALL I ASK..Best of luck this round.

An all in brawl with around 40 players into it happened in the last quarter with Fevola running 50 metres to get involved. A spectator also was involved and he was eventually,taken away by police. A very disappointing performance by listed MFC players especially after what happened last night. Dunn kicked three, two were very lucky. Bate and Maric hardly sighted. Tapscott needed the run.

Dappa- thanks for having a say- all I am after is some ruling for next year.By gee he has a good side now.However, some of his players such as Krueser did not start playing until 4 weeks ago.I am not worried about being beaten this week- actually, I think I can get over the line.But HT is playing me next week and I don't want him to gain another advantage over me by unfair trading with Scarlet. Especially when OMR claims Scarlet has not been fair with him.Best of luck this round Dap.

Good point you raised..I didn't want to raise it before I

Please note ALL PLAYERS..the reason I have brought up the Scarlet scenario is for us to look at the rules for next year.Also, if a new player/s come in , they understand how to play..I didn't know how to propose a trade till HT pointed that out to me..unfair advantages..

HT- It is not abut allowing Scarlett to trade as such - he should have been barred weeks ago. It is an unfair advantage when he did not play for 8 weeks and gave just about a walk in for 8 players.This affects things like wins, percentages etc.. Re me being behind 7 to 1.Get real HT, I'll give him a good workout- not one of my players have played yet. It is nor sour grapes that I am binging this up- it is the rules for the future and lastly, it is all right you being smug about the whole thing, he didn't play against you when you won 8 to 1. It is unfair to 8 players whom have to play Scarlett on their merits and that is NOT FAIR IN MY OPINION.There should be rules to cover that.And as a betting man - do you want to bet Scarlet against me this round.And have a look at the ladder and see where I am and where you are Mr Trader..Know all. And I would like to also congratulate Deevoted..Whilst he hasn't had the greatest time he at least has played every round and given his best..been responsible to all other players and has not given an unfair advantage to others..

Talking of Scarlet- whom I'm currently playing,I feel it is not fair that several of us have to play him now ,when he is fair dinkum and others played him when he was not interested and had many players not even playing.This happened 8 times.Next year the rules have to cover this type of behaviour as it is not fair for all in the comp..If I loose, I'm protesting.I don't believe he should even be able to trade.He should be barred.

Thanks for letting us know.

Don't worry about missing a ew matches..just look forward to a little tank coming our way...

Yes he did. Happened before quarter time - seemed concussed. Didn't return. When Jack hits them, they do not get up. Viney will make the All Australian Under 18 team IMO.

Congrats to all & sundry however particular thanks also need to be given to W.J &Andy and a special mention to HT & R.R(miss my old sparring mate).

Agree totally.It was a great show.Always intruiging.

Likewise and very well stated. RIP S.W

I have currently really scrutinised our list and the 3 major requirements we need to back up are: Another Tall forward,Tall backman, Small backman and a crumber. Although we recruited Cook,Davis & McDonald last year,we still need back up in these areas IMO..And in particular if Morton,Maric&Warnock are traded.

I second your point. I also think another backstop in Spencer is required. However I question whether Campbell is required as another back stop.He maybe better kept as our Ruck coach and give an opening to another young player..

Quite true with good points raised.Also last two pre seasons heavily interrupted.Give him a break.

What a great position we will be in when our players have got over their injuries. It will place tremendous pressur on all players to play there best to be a part of a finals campaign.

Very interesting to note the differences in height regarding the AFL exposure on Matthew Jacquier (Forward - Woodville).If you google him it shows him as Height: 175cm Weight: 78kg DOB: 29/3/93 Recruited from: Woodville/West Torrens (SA) yet the NAB AFL UNDER 18 Championship brochure shows him at 188 cms & 83 kg. If he has grown lately from 175 cms to 188 cms- who knows what he will grow to- 201 cms tall;? I hear he is a talent, but if he doesn't grow we will have too many of the same type. We need talls- 194 cms upwards.

Thanks for your input.I have stated all along that Tom has full rights to hold off talks till his contract expires at years end. Glad to hear his management confirm this.However, still think, Harrington, Schwab should be gggggaining or having discussions with the AFL to discuss compensation- if he did leave the club .

That would be the minimum..I'd make RR add Swan to that...

Put up a worthy trade to me.. stress the word..WORTHY..has to be worthwhile to both - for a Win/Win..that is the major issue that I have noticed during my time here.You also made a very bad blnder getting rid of Ablett.