Adam The God

I like it. But we'd need another speedster in there that we can guarantee goals out of IMV. Still not mobile enough when the ball hits the deck with that combo.

Not so wobbly after all. I'm learning some military history in this thread! Conceivable, but I don't buy it. Goodwin has a track record of playing players out of position. This is more likely IMV, but we shall see. It's not a bad idea to be honest, but I think we'd want to look at someone a bit younger. May is 28 and won't be around forever. I'd be looking at getting another KPD (in the 23-25 age bracket) to learn alongside May and partner Lever when May retires.

This is a great post. ?

Yep, unfortunately they're rating his poor midfield play and that's more worrying to me. He doesn't, as you say, have Oliver's hands or vision, yet they've rated his rugby to be better than Oliver's year. It's astounding to me, but c'est la vie. Needs to play a different role and I don't think it'd be a good idea to sign him more than 3 or 4 years. That would take him through until 30 and then we can reassess on one or two year contracts depending on the state of his body.

He move up to Byron after this?

Well done, Trac. Thought Oliver was far better in the midfield, Petracca was a star, but forward and mid. While Oliver controlled our games and gets passed over again. Had we beaten made the 8 ahead of the Dogs, I wonder if he gets the nod ahead of Macrae.

Would love Daniels. Crafty, pressure forward. Disagree.

Yeah, not sure about that one. You can just as easily get a decent competitor in the ruck off the rookie list.

Exactly where I stand on this. The ruck position is vastly overrated.

Agreed. But mostly in the context of first possession midfielder. If he's playing a defensive role, I think he could absolutely slot into our midfield. I think Harmes could do the exact same thing. And both could/should play forward when not playing the defensive midfield role. Completely agree with this. I think it's clear Harmes to half back didn't work, so he should be moved into the mid/forward role. I'd even have him on a wing. Exactly. If we tried playing Weideman as a rover, he'd be useless too. Harmes needs to be played in the right position. The same as Gus. It'd be great if they had more versatility but when the midfield is your go, it's your go. One of those guys has played almost 150 games of rugby and the other two have demonstrated they're capable of playing disciplined midfield footy without him.

You can probably guess my position on this. Good move. If Max goes down, we'll be able to cover. This could help us land a pick that might prize a Saad from Essendon.

McClure seems to be folliclly challenged (sorry Demonlanders who are), so that's where I'd be directing my wrath instead of kicking him in the balls, but he definitely has some smarm about him.

I'd give the game up if we lost Oliver. So just putting that out there.

Right, so you're implying that Petracca wants to be traded. There are five guys contracted to 2022 (ie two years left on the contract) and only one of them is represented by D'Orazio.

To be fair to @Lord Nev he actually mentioned it to me earlier today, so prior to Footy Classified...

As I said the other day, we should be putting a 4 year contract extension to Clarry this off season and putting a similar deal in front of Trac too.

No proof, OD, just reading the tea leaves.

You've still got two guys that don't tackle at all; Spargo and ANB are inconsistent in that area; and Kozzie and Bedford hadn't played an AFL game before. This impacts upon consistency obviously.

See, this is why I wonder whether we need to revert potentially to a stronger more aggressive press like the 18 man press we used in 2018. We managed to lock teams inside our forward 50 a lot that year. 2017 as well. We thoroughly dominated teams for large portions of the game. I like the idea that we do have a second way of playing if we want now. And that is to sit deeper and press in the middle of the ground and zone across the forward half, rather than everyone pressing. It may well require us to play the more aggressive press where appropriate and then know when to revert to the second system. To me this is the plan B that we've lacked for so long. I don't think we're particularly good at the three zone midfield press, but with time and another pre season, who knows?

Good post mate. Ultimately, we are trying to play a game that won't really pay off unless we have a lot of forward half pressure. Problem is, as you say, we don't bring enough forward half pressure. IMO this is down to our terribly unbalanced forwardline, where half the guys we select don't tackle. I'd be going all in on pressure forwards with good goal sense. See if we can shake anyone loose from Richmond or Geelong.

Another lefty too. Very Hawthornesque.

This is a furphy. How does running power help you win a centre clearance? Explosiveness might, but not running power. IMV, it's a stoppage set ups issue. Oliver is the best in the league at winning clearances, particularly around the ground clearances. But we don't do enough at centre stoppage set ups. We're not inventive enough. Take a look at some of the more unconventional stuff Geelong and Richmond have been trying. By comparison, we've become really predictable and static at these stoppage situations. Oliver has a rare blend of explosiveness from a standing start that enables him to win clearance, he's a freak, but the rest of the team are often too flat footed with these set ups. If there's anyone we absolutely need to target it's a good midfield / stoppages coach. I think Matthews has been reasonable over the journey, but I think it's time for a fresh pair of eyes. In 2021, I think we need to remember: 1) to play a stopper at every stoppage, whether that be Harmes or Viney. It needs to happen. 2) Viney should never be first possession mid if we can help it. So play him defensively or in the forwardline or off the back of stoppage. At least bursting off the back of stoppage could be predictable to his team mates. 3) we have a nasty habit of using Gawn to tap at his feet. Naturally, we don't do this all the time, but we get no separation in our set ups from centre bounces, because I think we're fearful we'll get done on the outside. But this works both ways though. If we force the opposition to man us wider of the contest, not only can Max get more creative with his tap work, but our mids can hit the drop of the ball at speed, instead of taking the ball as it's dropped on their heads and then being tackled straight away. Separation in the midfield is just as important as separation for a leading forward IMO. We should be looking for ways to maximise this separation. I'm not sure if it was me mate, but I think there was some discussion the other day that we've potentially gone far too control orientated and tried to slow down the game, when our players are perhaps better suited to the faster contest, getting it forward and playing territory. I don't necessarily agree with this, because I think teams will try to slow us down and we've got to be able to move between different modes of play and speeds. Transitioning from attack, to defence and back again to attack etc is an art and the formation of this is what I thought we'd witnessed in both the Collingwood and St Kilda games, albeit the ball use entering 50 versus St Kilda was shocking. Had we used it better that game, I think we would have won more easily, however I think this comes with time. We seemed to completely abandon this system for the last 4 rounds. It's this system that is very Geelong, which was to often lose centre clearance, but win the around the ground clearances. Oliver led the way here, but Petracca also won a stack of contested possessions and finished just behind Oliver there. Viney also won a bunch of CPs too. However, I think with a dominant ruckman like Max and dominant contested mids, we should be looking to attack from stoppage far more. It feels to me like we've conceded our biggest weapon because the better teams haven't allowed us to play ultra attacking and slowed us down. When we played aggressive 18 man territory press in 2017-2018, we actually dominated the likes of Richmond for large periods of games, but our old foe, forward 50 efficiency, let us down. I wonder if it's merely a few tweaks to the 2020 system (3 wall press), plus more attacking stoppage set ups and more balanced personnel as described above?

I don't think we should predicate the idea of value on what we would receive in compensation for Jack. I think we should be looking at what removing his presence from our team brings to the midfield balance (cleanness from stoppage, ball use, predictability to team mates etc). So I'd argue it could be a case of removing the ball and chain from the ankle of our midfield and enabling it to move with more freedom and agility. It sounds like Jack has re-signed anyway, so it may well be a moot point.

Loved May's year, but agree that he started slowly and IMV wasn't rock solid until after the Port game.

Agreed. I'm not saying Max will rest on his laurels. I'm just saying he's too easy to play against.