buck_nekkid

Great, can you please point me to it? Looking back through this thread hasn’t revealed it. Thx in advance!

An article about our preseason in the HUN, behind as paywall. Anyone be bothered to get it and share it?

Best available, then positional need. Let’s see how he turns up and turns it on…. Go the Lisp!

Lawdy Lawdy NO! Some Journo wants me to click a story why he thinks this is a good idea?? Is he brain dead? Just wanting clicks? Both?

Or Wagner?

Now the Derkson decision makes more sense

So we take Griller and Sullie at 7/8, then hit up Pickett with our later selection, then rookie White and sinnerman….. (dream scenario….)

Each player is given targets and a program to follow over their off-time. They will train, but not in club gear or in ‘organised’ events. The aim is to come back in shape to help make the formal pre-season a success. Most footballers have a short break, or surgery and recovery, then get right back into it. You will hear commentators say they ‘came back in ripping shape’, for example….

Yep, if Heath is better, then he has to be #1 ruck. I have no probs with that at all…

Currently i would have a blank team sheet. Every spot must be earned.

We have been rated B+ down for our trade period. Would you agree, and if not, why not? (I would rate us an A - problems out, replacements in, needs addressed and a handful of draft opportunities. The proof is in the Pudding, and I think with out the chef and the fruitcake, the pudding should be sweeter…)

Ah chee. Otherwise no Fanks. If they cant find a home via trade, we should no scoop then up.

Does the spat inside the MR affect us? Their massive debts, their revolving door CEOs, the chairman issues??

We exchanged a boy of Clay(ton) for a man of Steele!

Checker in 41?