beelzebub

I cant for the life of me understand why we don't emulate what we did at times in the preseason.. I.e had option both sides that worried opposition enough to leave glaring holes in the corridor. Noooooooo.... lets go back to kicking it out left.. every single fn time. Insanity.

We wake to a new dawn. Well done MFC. You grew some, put the Big Boy pants on and went out to suggest to those Clowns we arent to be used as doirmats. No longer will you [censored] with the MFC . Off you go lad. Keep playing as you do. The whole thing was ridiculous. Just simple general play.. Nothing in it...play on. Nothing to see here. Go Dees

Exactly... The entire game is essentially a collision of teams. The AFL is playing with dynamite.

an answer to our sound....

Its nothing about Melbourne....everything about the game. If the AFL prevails in this blanket bs ambiguity then everything....EVERYTHING about the game can be got at. I make no apology for supposing the gravity of this is huge. This is not about one instance of incidental contact...its everything about ratifying nonsense. If this gets up ( for the AFL )... what next.

A certain sense of reality to all of that. Just further proof those empowered to oversee our game are just the wrong people. Instead of maintaining the fabric of the game they are just constantly cutting and slicing at the game. Not interested in actually refining and improving the game... just stuffing it around virtue signalling. Frustrates and dusgusts me.

Has this now evolved into a Rosa Parks moment for the Game ? Make a stand....or else...

The very next time we play him ;)

Have you got it on media?? Demonland FB and any other pages you can post to ?

Why no.... do you normally stick a banana in yours ? 🤔 That's quite odd, but I'm not here to judge .

Thankgod for this thread....sanctuary from all that other nonsense. Might settle back with a......

One of the 10 might .. 🤔🤔🤔🥴

The incident, for want of any other suitablly non-eventful occasion, has occurred anywhere up of 10s of thousands of times in this game. The very nature of the game and play will cause 2, 3, 4 or more players to come into collision etc as they're all trying to do the same things in the same space with the same ball. Somehow this warrants citing... fmd Insanity meets stupidity

You're over-rating Gleeson Red. Judging him on actions and comments he's plainly as idiotic as his colleagues. What is...is

Signed the petition Honestly could there be a dumber instance of bloody-mindedness by the AFL... and many many to choose from. Its a travesty of common sense .( rare commodity given.. ) The action is JUST footy ffs. Theyre truly destroying this great game. What a bunch of [censored]

Now we've seen that......please never do it again !!!

In all fairness... i dont believe a word another club utters...especially after the fact....and to cover their own [censored].

Time for the dog to wag the tail. We made this game..... Time to remind some....

Could wear arm bands too... ;) Need to go on the offensive now... And we know what we need to hit...

Again dudded by theatrics and [censored] by an other club. I'm livid

Yep...time to take this out of their playground. [censored] them

This is where we say as a club enough is enough.. Yes...go Ballistic. Throw everything and the sink back at this joke of an organisation.. An organisation by the way that is there to do our bidding not the other way around. Time to pull on the big pants and remind these clowns just who the F we are...and who they are.....our employees!! Time to wake up this comp .

Do NOT roll ovef Melbourne. This is the moment to grow up. Stop being a doormat Filth wouldn't accept this.... theyd be pushing their media barrows out already.

Jones was a loose cannon sniper dog. Saw him outside a bigw years back ready to sign books . Looked a beaten man I was conflicted .

Problem is you're dealing with shifty bloody afl smart-arses. All they want to do is justify their coin, remind minions of their position. The questioning is designed to trap They are ( insert derogatory term of preference) x 10