beelzebub

And if Port finishes first as opposed the Filth.....well thats a very different proposition. Personally i see the big dance as a prison bar event. Still...lets try and get over Brisbane and see what the view looks like then.

Who owns/controls it ? Cheers

Quite....if we cant knock off the Leos on our own deck......much of what comes after is moot imho. We'll be making up the numbers... This isnt an 8 point game coming up... its more than that....it's about relevance.

You can have both... You could say develop Caulfield as your primary base and still utilise Casey. After all Casey would still use/need Casey..

Your points may be lost on some

God aint listening

Roffey has a lot of answering to do imho. Not really sure whats she's doing there.

Not a lot in that game....probably should have been. Lucky we were better by a bit tonight and they were off ...otherwise. Posters....meh...strange. Oh well thanks for the 4pts

We won There is nothing more to add.. Plenty to subtract...... but we won. Funny thing is....im not sure how.

You dont like being challenged eh. Go back and read again. Its not that complicated though you love to make everything exactly that. Or not..

Rubbish... it simply predicts two things really.. you may retain the ball more in a pocket...and youre far more likely to score in the corridor. Pleased dont offef up the falacy that greater retention = scoring. This is the greatest furphy of all... Its about efficiency and accuracy. You may not have ir as much where youd like it...but youll score higher. Stangely the game is about the latter not the former. The best teams over history are the ones that dont stuff around.

How much more likely though to kick a sausage from the corridor as opposed the pockets. It's not, imo, about having the ball, its being productive with it. Grand effort on your stuff . Cheers

Dead man walking.....

Someone got in on false pretences methinks.

50 points probably.... but how many goals ???

Marvellous is better at least than kitty litter park... just sayin'

I know... i know... mea culpa

Which makes me think/hope we're going in with lowered eyes

Just hoping we trying something different/better going in the 50. Dead set this hail mary [censored] is [censored] footy

If we controlled the ball better in the front half , we wouldn't need to expend as much energy in chaotic contesting. It will be interesting to see how we play tomorrow night.

No...just barrack for us and hope we win. That's enough.... ( crossed fingers and toes)

It makes no sense though ....if fatigue and tiredness are a concern, or consequence of the mythical loading , to adopt a game style that is low percentage return on maximum effort. That's plain dumb...surely.

What is "the" position regarding 'offloading'...( with...umm.... compensation ) ... Asking for a mate ....

Are we to suppose we ARE looking to straighten up our inbounding ? The only talls i can see playing in the arc is Benny...and probably a resting Ruck. This to me suggests ( my god..hopefully) a lot less if any bombing. Being 'shorter' forward are we lowering eyes and opening up , giving ourselves some space ?? Time will tell Go Dees

Me thinks you're missing the actual point. Thats the last thing we ever ought to do.