whatwhat say what

bailey laurie dodges around a butterfly

dees still in front where it counts at 3/7 time

richmond: 1 injury (13.6.84)
melbourne: 0 injuries (12.8.80)

pup brown is all class

his lateral movement gives anb a chance to hit schache f50 for a goal

dees in front

12.8.80 (0 injuries)
12.6.78 (1 injury)

1 minute ago, Ugottobekidding said:

I think Goodwin is clueless 

ugottabekidding by name and nature

Just now, dee-tox said:

Any positives? We're only 11 points down 😀

4 actually

and NO injuries (touch wood)

kynan brown looks like an afl player to me

Just now, Ugottobekidding said:

Does anyone have a score

richmond: 1 injury (12.6.78)
melbourne: 0 injuries (10.7.67)

move jake lever forward; who says no?

3 minutes ago, Demonland said:

If you’re not worried about our disposal you’ve achieved the highest level of zen possible. 

death, taxes, and dees' turnovers giving away easy goals

1 minute ago, marieisademon said:

As Iverson said, it's practice you're talking about practice

methinks you've completely misinterpreted what ai was saying - practice hard, play hard

windsor and pup brown really encouraging as first year players

2 minutes ago, marieisademon said:

Yep the posters that are going on about there's no pressure on the turnover, do they really think that's the way we're going to play in the season with no pressure

nah

train the way you want to play

also are now in front on the only scoreboard that matters:

1 injury to the tigs, 0 to the dees

1 minute ago, Tarax Club said:

2/7 time score?

1 injury a side

4 minutes ago, smiFFy said:

something tells me Goody is going to be spending the next fortnight on defence

pressure more so than defence per se i would argue

the lack of effort was....strange

chin gets a goal after a mark (after?) on the siren

that was a shocking 30 mins of footy from us - last 10 mins of the first and first 20 of the second

bad miss from jvr

captain's goal

may is having a barry crocker

anb is not a centre square mid

he gets turned inside out

1 minute ago, Cheap Seats said:

yes,

but what would your rather. Kids get exposure and a run or lock tha game down in Feb?

i'd just like to see no injuries tbh

Just now, Cheap Seats said:

I think you need to look at it in presepective though. Lot of young kids and are not as clean as the Tigers on the turnover.

and not putting any pressure on turnover

they're going from d50 to f50 with no one putting a scintilla of effort against em

Just now, Demonland said:

Conceded 7 goals in a row. 

and this is against a supposed rebuilding side missing its entire starting midfield and #1 forward

not great

geez louise

6 in a row

lack of defensive pressure on outside runners for them is a notable concern

5 in a row now

once we allow space on the outside they're away

4 in a row to the tigs

our inability to stop a run-on when it gets going is an issue

some sloppy kicks of late - anb's f50 entry, may's exit d50, etx