Posts posted by whatwhat say what
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
i can't remember who posted it on one of these threads, but i've quoted this diatribe so many times...
It’s over. At some point the analytics told the AFL that 85% of its audience aren’t going anywhere - regardless of results.
Huge, monumental spectacle is what the AFL wants its brand to be. Why spend decades building up half the competition when the other half already provides everything you need?
The smart big clubs woke up to this a while back. Collingwood’s list strategy is diabolical on paper, but they know they’ll just top up on talent because the system is built to sustain them. 3 of Geelong’s 4 best players came from other clubs.
This year was the least competitive season of AFL ever. The top 9 teams were decided by mid April. Thats 5.5 months of meaningless footy for half the clubs. The Age report on how poor this season was because they aren’t feeding directly from the AFL trough. Everyone else just happily follows the talking points, or else they might not get a good free suite at next years Gather Round.
It annoys me enormously that 2025 will be a huge financial success for the AFL because its overall product has stunk this year, and the guy leading the organisation never really wanted the job, and clearly has no vision for the future of the game. This is all part of the problem. It continues to succeed in spite of itself, because we love the game too much.
the '85%' number is something that my friends and i keep referring to each other
-
1 minute ago, 2021 said: I was surprised in the below video, at about 5 mins in, that is says we have named the 2 targets we are after in the draft..
where'd they get this quote from, that we're targeting lachy dovaston and aidan schubert?
-
Edited by whatwhat say what
1 hour ago, rpfc said: Interesting Sydney pushing out players to go for Curnow. They are so aggressive aren’t they? Lockett, Franklin, Curnow.
don't forget kurt tippett nor barry hall
the latter the only one of their many high profile key forward recruits to win a premiership with them, as skipper no less
-
-
Edited by whatwhat say what
59 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said: The massive difference between us and Hawthorn at the time was both Hodge and Mitchell were at the end of their careers, Trac has 5yrs min and Clarrie 6.
which i suspect is why we're happy to pull the trigger now - we'll get significant more for them now than in another 2-3 years
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 hour ago, BW511 said: This quote from Charlie sums up the Goodwin era for me, it was a success on the whole but very robotic;
• "I feel like at Melbourne I played the small forward role and it gave me good building blocks but it was a rigid role, without freedom. I spoke to North about playing a role with a bit more freedom. I play my best when playing on instinct." - Charlie Spargo
If King can let the boys play on natural instinct a little more, we will be infinitely better to watch - sure, we might get a few heavy touch ups but we lose a lot anyway
crowbot-alike
goodwin very much came from the neil craig school of playing to a system-based approach
-
17 minutes ago, GawnOfTheDead said: West Coast. What a joke of a club.
They’re now saying they’re open to trading off the number 1 pick for players, though somewhat unlikely.
The same club just said “we are so bad, we need so much help, please help us AFL”, receiving extra picks and handouts.
i wonder if players under contract were able be traded without consent we'd be targeting petracca and oliver for picks 1 and 2...
Training Ground?
in Melbourne Demons
tigs will get waverley part-time til punt road oval is rebuilt
i am confident we'll announce caulfield and plan to be safely ensconsed there by 2030 when they'll start on the rebuild of the southern stand