no need to get personal. i'm sure you can do better than that
my point re guevara was that he was more interested in guerrilla warfare than genuine revolutionary activities and responsibilities. he preferred to cover himself in blood rather than genuine revolution and just became a constant mercenary albeit a marxist mercenary.
he may have been a poster boy to intellectual socialist fan-boys but hardly a "great" revolutionary as you claimed. imho opinion of course. the article i referenced was just one i came across and i wasn't necessarily endorsing all he said, it was just to reference a different perspective . there are many other che-critical articles out there.
no probs with castro being described as a great revolutionary, though ultimately he failed