daisycutter

or gil has breakfast meeting with a big club's coach......eezy peezy

True he was coerced, but he's an adult. i sorta agree with you but it becomes more complex when your defence is one of coercion and then of innocence

bit hard when you pleaded guilty in the first place

maybe he was booked up with a scott

don't eat humble pie yet, lucy........it could still be just a sop to quieten the hordes of dissenters and nothing will change

will depend on counsel (presumably at top guy this time) and the jury they conjure up (maybe the hawkin's jury - lol)

i don't think it is as simple as that

we thought that after the hawkins benchmark .........but then the afl just rolled in a completely new jury

and ziebell got his suspension thrown out must remember that jury make-up and request it next time a demon appeals

you didn't see the hawkin's one which started this all off and set a precedent?

there is legal and illegal blocking, clint

the "fuss",rgb, stems mainly from the inconsistency from week to week

since when is it gil's job to instruct the umpires in-season on game-day emphasis and to make rulings on interpretations of the game's rules and all without proper process what makes gil any more an expert on the rules than any other mug punter. he's a ceo ffs not umpires advisor afl's lack of integrity just continues to roll on

interesting how the afl reduce the mrp to 1 single person (+ 1 afl oversighter) in order to get consistency in judgement and punishment then have a tribunal with an advocate and a jury of three, all of which changed from one week to the next on a hearing of virtually the same unusual charge. consistency, not for the record i don't think any of the 4 umpire handling charges were really severe enough to warrant a suspension (fine, yes) but the afl process can't set the bar one week and then raise it the next without criticism

Hey daveydee aka dr who, i'll do you a favour this is the correct link for you http://puntroadend.com/ - bookmark it. now toddle off and have real fun instead of trolling

or any time of the year ?

you got sucked in rjay.......dftft

did the umpire look like he was needing protection? could equally argue he prevented the umpire from doing his job however, jake has more chance than elwood of getting off with a fine, i think

Correct. Some people = AFL such is football

and hibbo played half forward because he kicked a goal

that link doesn't say he played midfield those big banners - defence - midfield - forwards - are not headings he did however spend a lot of time up the ground and not too close to the goals

yep, and they'll probably blame the afl anyway

1/2 a game each

you from frankston, pro?

he's better off out of that cess-pit