Everything posted by Redleg
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
I see that the Tiges are going to go hard in trade week and we should do the same. Obviously we should look for quality or perhaps a hidden gem, like a player who has ability but is not getting a go at his club. We have salary cap room with you know who leaving and will have more with some delistings.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
The problem is that the AFL now have more clubs not wanting to play at Etihad, like Saints for example. They could give us less games at the G as a result. The AFL don't care about home grounds other than Geelong and Interstate. They regard the G as a league ground not the home of the Dees. We are in the middle of a major corporate dictatorship.
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
Geelong make $500k for a 20000 crowd. They get 8 of those games a year. Over $4m, We break even or have to send a cheque to the AFL for the same crowd at the G. Anyone see anything unfair in this? One further fact. The four richest clubs in the AFL who also spend the most on their footy departments are in the top 4 spots on the ladder. Another coincidence?
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
The No T$ No B$ Thread
Simply put the AFL can't afford GWS to fail and therefore will do anything to help them. That means stuff the other clubs except maybe GC. What we should have done was ensure that no player under 22 could be taken by screaming through the press so that the AFL could not then say all the clubs agreed to it. We now know that was another AFL head office lie.
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
- The No T$ No B$ Thread