Mouseymoo

Probably. Guess it depends if WC see something they like that will go before 13 and they see the first 7 as similar. It's clutching at straws tbh

If Essendon don't trade up with WC we could be a strong chance to trade 7 & 8 for WC 2 & 13. Robey and Pickett. I'd be good with that..

Looking at everyone's assets I don't see how we can get a mid teens pick without trading 7/8 down..

Actually, if Ess were to trade up, surely it would be their 5 & 6 for WC 2&13.. If that happens there's no other obvious avenues for us to trade into an early second..

West Coast might be the play. Especially if Essendon trade up with them to get pick 2. Gc F1 & 37 to WC for # 13 & 34. Or just GC F1 for WC pick 13. WC spread a pick into next year presumably Ess trading up will give them an extra early pick this year..

I don't buy it. We traded 23 to GC as part of the package that got us their F1 in the first place.

If he was worth two firsts surely we nab him

Jeez there are some hard taskmasters here.. These aren't the finished products yet..

They don't the currency. They have pick 16 then 48

I've seen a few phantoms where Sharp drops to us. Surely we pounce yeah? The cupboard for developing inside mids is pretty bare..

A month ago this draft was so bad we traded out of it, now it's on our doorstep we're selling the future to have more pics in it... We have to make up our minds 😂

Zero chance we use 7 or 8, his highlights show flashes of kozzie-esque movement but not too much else. Imo it's not between him and Dovaston - Dovaston an early first and Sumner Pickett a more speculative late first/early second. Dovaston cake Latrelle cherry on top.

Grlj/Taylor & Dovaston combo I feel will be a great result. Would he happy with that.

Where's the fun in that tho?

[censored] yeah been sleeping on this guy. He's exactly what we need, that's some great drive from the backline, playes similar to Rivers with better disposal. Huge yes from me.

Our future second wouldn't be that far off their future first either. If it's the cost of doing business, so be it. It's just interesting to note in the heat of the trade, pics are just numbers swapping hands, but when the rubber hits the road, we now probably miss out on Pickett

We gave 24, 28 and a future second. Surely we could have kept one of 24 or 28 and told GC to use their nepo privileges to make the points up another way.

That Judd compensation we threw away to GC would come in handy right about now.

From that you've got to think it's either 2 mids, or a mid and a "need" (best small or Tall Dovaston/Schubert). Was all suppositions from Cal. We're gonna have to wait for more water to go under the bridge.

Thank God. You'd think that after we just moved on Oliver and Tracc, have an ageing Viney and for the most part unproven kids as depth..

I've warmed so much to Dovaston I'll be [censored] if we don't draft him. It's not that I necessarily think he's elite - I've seen better highlight packages in my day - it's that I feel he will bring what we need, what Kingy wants, and in an area of the ground we're lacking.

@adonski bigfooty's a bit light-on in the phantom drafts this year no? There's only like a few people that are doing them..

Every year is a Collingwood death ride my guy.

He seems to make the right decisions, has a bit of composure and balance about him. Looks to be one of those solid peices you need in your midfield, a bit of break away and delivery to the forward line. Little bit of Spargo about him. We couldn't do much worse than him and Dovaston at 7/8

WA boy. Pass.