Mouseymoo

Do you think WB would trade pick 14 for GC F1st to stock up the pics for Butters?

We're going to take another WA boy aren't we? You know then the mouse goes for the electrified cheese they get the hint after the first couple of zaps.. What will it take for us to learn?

It's worth noting that these boys rate Sharp very high and Jess is a WC supporter so he's chosen Sharp at 2. I rate Sharp but have a feeling WC will go Dursma and CDT, Grilj to Rich, Sharp slides to Essendon and Cumming slide to us..

We should be throwing everything at free agent Ben King too. Bring them over together.

They've posted another mock 30 (their final draft) since then where they took some criticism on board and changed it to Grlj and Dovaston. Needless to say, that result would be nuts! @10:39

Yeah I'm with you on our forward situation but would rather adress our mids and small forward needs through the draft (were good at that) and throw everything at an already developed key forward when the time is right (we should be buttering Ben King up big time)

Probably. Guess it depends if WC see something they like that will go before 13 and they see the first 7 as similar. It's clutching at straws tbh

If Essendon don't trade up with WC we could be a strong chance to trade 7 & 8 for WC 2 & 13. Robey and Pickett. I'd be good with that..

Looking at everyone's assets I don't see how we can get a mid teens pick without trading 7/8 down..

Actually, if Ess were to trade up, surely it would be their 5 & 6 for WC 2&13.. If that happens there's no other obvious avenues for us to trade into an early second..

West Coast might be the play. Especially if Essendon trade up with them to get pick 2. Gc F1 & 37 to WC for # 13 & 34. Or just GC F1 for WC pick 13. WC spread a pick into next year presumably Ess trading up will give them an extra early pick this year..

I don't buy it. We traded 23 to GC as part of the package that got us their F1 in the first place.

If he was worth two firsts surely we nab him

Jeez there are some hard taskmasters here.. These aren't the finished products yet..

They don't the currency. They have pick 16 then 48

I've seen a few phantoms where Sharp drops to us. Surely we pounce yeah? The cupboard for developing inside mids is pretty bare..

A month ago this draft was so bad we traded out of it, now it's on our doorstep we're selling the future to have more pics in it... We have to make up our minds 😂

Zero chance we use 7 or 8, his highlights show flashes of kozzie-esque movement but not too much else. Imo it's not between him and Dovaston - Dovaston an early first and Sumner Pickett a more speculative late first/early second. Dovaston cake Latrelle cherry on top.

Grlj/Taylor & Dovaston combo I feel will be a great result. Would he happy with that.

Where's the fun in that tho?

[censored] yeah been sleeping on this guy. He's exactly what we need, that's some great drive from the backline, playes similar to Rivers with better disposal. Huge yes from me.

Our future second wouldn't be that far off their future first either. If it's the cost of doing business, so be it. It's just interesting to note in the heat of the trade, pics are just numbers swapping hands, but when the rubber hits the road, we now probably miss out on Pickett

We gave 24, 28 and a future second. Surely we could have kept one of 24 or 28 and told GC to use their nepo privileges to make the points up another way.

That Judd compensation we threw away to GC would come in handy right about now.

From that you've got to think it's either 2 mids, or a mid and a "need" (best small or Tall Dovaston/Schubert). Was all suppositions from Cal. We're gonna have to wait for more water to go under the bridge.