Bowserpower

That is true. I tried running the exercise but it wasn't easy. Geelong with Ablett Collingwood with Grundy West Coast with Judd Melbourne with Hogan

The coach should be the buck stopper

We need to get rid of one of them, no question about it. Between the two, I’d probably keep Petracca because he clearly has more upside and can still turn games around when he’s on. He’s shown glimpses of brilliance, and there’s still some to tap into. Oliver has been seriously underwhelming. He hasn’t been close to the level we expect from him—not even remotely. His form has been crap, no question about it and he’s just not contributing in the way he should be. Honestly, I’d even be willing to pay a portion of his salary just to get him off the books and onto another team. It’s harsh, but we can’t afford to carry passengers if we want to move forward., and he’s just not contributing in the way he should be.

Alright, let us know how you go mate

Sure. I mean you did clearly state that the club relegated him without a shred of evidence but ok.

Don't you think you've made enough of a fool of yourself these last few days?

Thanks mate.

And some people would have you believe that the coach is no problem and it solely falls on the players.

The compromised draft is going to make it complicated. Hopefully there are some good deals out there though.

Their statement turned out to be incorrect, we finally got clarification on that after some headaches.

Some people can't help themselves.

Right. Good luck with all that then.

You want another apology? What for now?

How were they twisted? Your message has been consistent until now. "It was an undeniable fact that Goodwin was relegated" Going in circles now.

Again if you said it that way there wouldn't have been a problem. My knowledge is pretty good.

That's more like it! Those are actual facts. Stating that Goodwin was relegated to the bench as some kind of demotion is not. Come on mate, what do you want me to kiss your shoes or something?

I think if you had changed the word "fact" to "your opinion" and then no-one would have had a problem with what you said. A demotion would mean that Goodwin was no longer the head coach, this was more of a change of format. So it probably isn't right to say it was a relegation to the bench and you can probably see why people would say that you're making it up. I don't have a great memory of trivial arguments from 8 months ago but apologies if it makes you feel better.

Can you please stop arguing and show a source where they said this? There was no mention in that review that Goodwin relegated to the bench.

So Yze is not as good because he followed the coach's gameplan and actually played finals with it? Instant success the moment he got here with the players he had.

Disgraceful. We had it on a platter and served that up in the last. All coaches need to be fired and some players too. We are a loser team. Blame everyone but ourselves. Leadership on field is pathetic and off field we dont have a CEO for months. Just a laughing stock

Credit to the man. Legend of the club

Well it's not a terrible decision to keep a coach that made top 4 3 years in a row.

I do wonder sometimes if you all know what you are talking about

Strong words. Sacking him after the straight sets losses would have been harsh.

People didn't watch the game if they thought we didn't try. we did evertything possible to get back into it and if Melk kicked that last one who knows what could have happened. Thought we played really well at times.