BigDavidNoitzzzz

Narrow distro small forwards, imo almost never worth drafting high (ala running backs in the NFL)

Late in the season Saints tried to repurpose him a bit more forward (game against us in particular). I think he's got some adaptability to rest forward as he's still a good athlete vertically and is good overhead. Would think him and Langford can interchange as resting forward. Like this move if we can get him for limited capital.

Don't wish to begrudge the player. But he plays as a third tall in one of the better backlines in the comp and is regularly exposed. A player of potential sure, but not worth the figures thrown around imo.

You can infer the answer to most of these yourself. The differing sentiment between Trac and Oliver simply boils down to leverage. View any and every tidbit of trade slop interrogation with this lens.

Ballparks would've been floated here. The first convo a player manager has sans mention of $ would likely be the first.

Talk about a fence sit...

Second this. It's an awful role for an accumulator to remain effective in. Sheezel was used similarly early to mid season and he fell off a cliff until they threw him back into centre bounce. Flanders played majority off HB flank in 24 but surplus to requirements there once they traded for Rioli. Not 100% sold on the fit, and queries about damage by foot imo but definitely the profile of player we should be looking at.

dees internal draft board generally incredibly different to consensus rankings

it was a screenshot of the channel 7 feed

fun fact, in 2018 he posted an instagram story of Trac crying in the rooms post Geelong game at GMHBA. swiftly deleted

his management was firmly in the stays camp, whether directives have changed in the last 24 hours i'm unsure.