YearOfTheDees

O'Farrell (Blues) brings up Jacob van Rooyen's bump of Dan McStay, which was graded medium impact rather than high as in Martin's case. "It's not possible to understand why when you look at the footage."

Has anyone on here read the findings. This line. Brayshaw could’ve executed his kick in a different direction or in a different manner, landed in a different manner or in a slightly different location.

So its over to you AFL.

Brayden Maynard has been cleared of rough conduct. He is free to play.

It does not matter what they find unless they give him four weeks or more he will get off on appeal.

Hope the players are not as invested in this as we are. We still have a game to win on Friday.

I get the feeling he was an AFL witness.

Was the biomechnaist for the AFL or the Pies.

They are paid witness.

Melbourne has just released a medical report: “There’s no set timeframe on when Angus will return this year, it’s based on how he progresses through the protocol and also on the advice from the experts around his concussion management.”

They wanted something in his hands so he didn't shirtfront Gleeson.

Looks like the Pies are going with. Not Guilty on the grounds of insanity.

I have been wrong many many times with these hearing but I just don't see how he gets off.

All the pie fans giving the thumps up or down must think it's one of their reality TV shows and their voting someone off.

Who does he think was kicking the ball. I feel like he is making a massive mess of this.

Tell enough lies people believe you. That or Carlton have made an offer for next year.

He is claiming he touched the ball now.

After I DIDNT smother the ball.

Looks like they are going to sing bohemian rhapsody at some point.

Going to be a long night. A professor giving written evidence is not available until 5pm to answer questions via a video call. Jeff Gleeson notes the evidence includes reference to Galileo and Isaac Newton

David Zita on Twitter or X as it is called now is about as good as you will get.

@DavidZita1 · 2s Tribunal (has changed from first advised): Jeff Gleeson (Chair), Scott Stevens, Darren Gaspar Legal reps: Andrew Woods (AFL), Ben Ihle (Collingwood)

I'm hoping if they can say that the AFL can say look at his action pregame. One is fact.

Will Angus be asked to give evidence in this case. And if so who would call him the AFL or the Pies.

I think we are about to hear some real s--t from Collingwood. And even more if it goes to appeal.