Superunknown

Erm, oughtn’t he have recused himself or they put someone else in? Jesus wept!

That’s what is bizarre It was barely mentioned at all? What’s up with that? Are they seeking to remove duty of care?

Is that official?

Not other players. Just Maynard! And only a footy act! What could be wrong with that? We’ve just been shown it’s a-ok, right?

Jesus they whipped him with a feather boa. A sham! A schemozzle! A stitch up! A Clayton’s prosecution.

Yegads! I didn’t know I was disagreeable!

The victim blaming is terrible.

What?????

Tricky eh Alstonville Saints Ballina Bombers. Nope. I won’t have my kids playing the game though, I’m done

I’m the same (and nearby, just past Bangalow en route to Lismore). There’s a few of us Dees around. This makes familial relations hard given in laws are all Pies as is wife I’m done with this sport. So disheartening. Emailing Pert.

Incompetent or else they were drawing out all their arguments against which to appeal What would Occam say?

No worries Cripps better get a stack hat on. There’s gonna be football acts all over the ground. Blokes’ heads are literally going to explode

Why has the Overton window on this excluded carelessness and focussed on a deliberate bump???

I mean, I would have gotten a statistician in to declare how many standard deviations from the mean (how likely ) that was

I agree. I think they’re a huge chance especially if Hogan, Riccardi and Greene and Green get off the leash. Man I’d love to see Greene Maynard Maynard in a football act. Then Cox. Rest of their team, I don’t mind. If they could take out 90% of their supporters the world would be a better place. Really hard to get a read on what the AFL would want here. They need to disincentivise such hits as chook said, plus there’s the litigation, and I’m sure they don’t want Viney conducting tactical Maynards next week and the week like some sort of Exocet Maynard but they’d want a CFC CFC GF. Their lawyer’s arguments weren’t as clinical or forensic in their examination of options, nor did they appear to draw on other options and the training Players must receive in avoiding big hits? Shouldn’t they retain someone or have a couple of go to’s to prosecute these? Woods is a commercial lawyer first and foremost right?

No worries Gleeson! It’s open season on the head fellas!!! Have at it! Maynard yours is next bro! If he gets off, and the AFL doesn’t appeal (with a half decent lawyer), I am done with the sport including membership. Done. It’s soccer tennis and golf for my kids

Collingwood are laying all their cards out here - an AFL appeal can pull this all apart

If he gets off I am done with the game - this includes being a member. Done. My kids will never be allowed to play either.

Doesn’t that establish a pattern / intent for him? They’re trained to not do that, the fact that was his instinct speaks to a deeper inclination

Difficult but it can’t be excluded he didn’t need to put his hands out as he turned to bump

The biomechanist’s evidence is going to exclude any consideration of him deliberately turning to bump this whole thing is going to turn on his decision making and his failure to take a safer path I have a bad feeling about this I hope we anticipated this and have someone to provide opposing position

Why would he retract it? Bit of honesty in this world would be super (and currently unknown!)

Leaving aside the weirdness, tell me Member Demonland, when will Player Maynard front the Tribunal. Is it Weekday Tuesday of Date 12 of Month September in This Year of our Lord 2023?

That is energy sapping and distracting for them

What compromise is there? It’s not some political legislation negotiation. That’s bizarre.