Jump to content

Graeme Yeats' Mullet

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graeme Yeats' Mullet

  1. Nice by Viney, Spargo there Cmon BBB
  2. Disagree Kick it fwd and get it going fwd at all costs
  3. 9 possessions WB 1 possession Melb (May kickout)
  4. So much cleaner by hand We are [censored]
  5. This is a Joke They're cleaner by hand Dobbing goals from anywhere 8 frees to 2 Ffffffsssss
  6. Tmac doesn't look like getting a sniff again
  7. Massive miss there Needed to run in Pickett
  8. Great work ANB, some good touches and earned free Great finish Tracc
  9. ANB run getting to contests well
  10. They look cleaner by hand already
  11. I know And we love loose arms in tackles...
  12. Tackle hard, without giving away heaps of frees, and we're a strong chance
  13. Port home game tho
  14. Pies getting up would be very very very handy
  15. Grind out win, 10pts
  16. In a practice game, right??
  17. He really does trip over his own explanations with some frequency... Just like he tripped over Rayden Tallis' head that time
  18. I think this is why we've seen very few changes. A lot of specific roles being played, and with some success it's hard to justify risking the balance. We need some more polish, all over the park really, and I like Melksham for the clean touch If Melksham were to come in, it's probably for either AvB, Pickett or Fritsch, none of whom deserve to be dropped... Making it difficult again
  19. ANB is a bit of a whipping boy on this forum The suggestion of Melksham for ANB is flawed and fails to recognise the roles people are playing in this team. And we've heard the success this year is based on roles ANB is in the team for his 2-way run, as well as being an effective small forward. Holding our defensive structure up the ground requires this run from our forwards. This is why Goodwin thinks more of him than many D'landers Melksham does not bring the same 2-way run, in fact some on here suggest his defensive run and effort is poor at times. I don't think ANB has been as bad as many are saying. But if he is to go out, it has to be for a runner (Bowey? Hunt/Hibberd fwd and someone else in back? Baker?)
  20. Spot on, plus... We lost the tackle count by 20 ish
  21. They're all calling for it... None of them are in front of their opponents and running at it This is what's wrong with our forward line!
  22. This thread is a testament to the service Demonland.com provides for free speech It doesn't matter how misguided your view, you still have a voice Well done Demonland!!
  23. Great facts here Poor anaylsis though The problem for me here is the lack of a forward running towards the ball carrier Yes, Viney can improve, but FFS 3 of 3 forward targets stationary calling for a bomb over the top! Lead at the [censored] ball!!