Graeme Yeats' Mullet

Was that called play on by ump for not-15? He paused and seemed to be waved on

Spot on He was a bystander at too many contests

While he kicked 3, that's all he did. 1 mark, no tackles He was behind a lot, and could barely jump at the ball, hardly impacted a contest I think he'll be lucky to keep his spot

Was pretty sloppy

He was very good Copped a bit of the brunt of heavy pressure as the Tiges smashed our fwd movement with extra mem behind ball, and good tackling But when we freed up, ANB got good ball, and found targets

Starting the day with a short sharp replay of GF, 10mins to go 3rd Qrt Update: that hit the spot... as did the coffee

Is Jackson in doubt? Heard secondhand that Stevo reported rumours...

Ezzackly Embarrassing to 16 teams to hear they are 2nd on ladder

Horrendous 50 3 or 4 others let go already

Another Arms Out... No free kick

First free kick Preuss - Arms Out.... no 50

Dunno, mine was a genuine question We played most games early in weekend... (incl. Wed) so every possibility he's match fit

Don't mind it either, but not all that confident Weid will step up Who is medi-sub? Has Bedford been able to run around for Casey in recent weeks, or has he missed out on playing a few games? If he's missed out, then he should go back to Casey and someone else get a run as Sub Tomlinson is back strength with a bit of wing flex? Otherwise Melksham utility?

Great P15S take on The Front Bar

Yep as a neutral spectator it was a great game to watch and the only downside was horrible umpiring late in game

Agree Consistency is far more important than where you set the threshold for the decision to be paid Problem is, when you set the threshold really low the individual interpretation of dissent (which has element of subjectivity/feelings) will vary a lot - leading to worse inconsistency

Didnt AFL say decisions paid were correct, and there had been some "slippage" being decisions not paid (that should have been) How can Scott then say it can be up to umpires interpretation? It can't be both wrong (missed decisions) amd up to umpires to decide... Inconsistency is what infuriates people... this is designed for inconsistency, irrespective of whether you like the underlying rule or not.

The key issue is why are 90% (guesstimate, but would appear to be some large majority) of what AFL insists is breach of umpire dissent rules not being penalised just 5 rounds into season? "Slippage" (reported by Jon Ralph) can't account for that big an error, it must be that the rule simply doesn't make sense to the umpires, (who are supposedly receiving the dissent)

Hilarious 😂

Joh Ralph reported on OTC that the AFL have endorsed the decisions paid as correct and the (dozens of...) ones not paid have been errors by umpires and explained as "slippage" It's embarrassing for the AFL to be backing in a rule where only a few examples are being "correctly" umpired and the vast majority being ignored (and accepted as common sense by the whole football community)

Sums it up I think Hunt been a lot better last 2-3 weeks

Still a bit of work to do on 2022 expiries It's been a quiet few weeks since Sparrow news...

Awful umpiring in Ess Freo game At least they're consistently awful 😖

Win-Win Carlton demoralised in 2nd Half Port 0-5