titan_uranus

I found some of it on the AFL app. Maybe they've decided to move that data to the app, for reasons which escape me entirely,.

If you're talking about this season, it's still too early to know for sure but it seems the sides who will be pushing for top 4 alongside us are Brisbane, Sydney, Carlton, Geelong and, I'd argue, the Dogs. The Dogs are one of only two sides to have opened the season with three games against sides currently sitting in the top 8 (they've had us, Carlton and Sydney; Essendon's had us, Brisbane and Geelong). They admittedly have a tough fixture (repeat games against us, Sydney, Geelong, GWS and Hawthorn) but I think they will work out a forward structure in Bruce's absence and their midfield will alone be enough for most of the rest of the competition. Hawthorn, Fremantle and Collingwood are all in the 8 but I'm not convinced by any of them, Fremantle least so. Both Hawthorn and Collingwood I think are starting the season with vigour from their new coaches and their refreshing approaches, but IMO as the season presses on they will find themselves increasingly worn out.

Christian Salem says hi. I agree with you when you argue that TMac can (and does) play a role in the side. The problem is he's just not playing it well right now. If Brown is 100% unquestionably ready to go, IMO TMac has to make way as we have to reward Weideman's performance at AFL level after getting his chance on the back of hard work and persistence (listen to Goodwin and all the players talk about how much they valued his decision to sign a new contract, buckle down and work hard over summer to earn another chance - they cannot, and IMO will not, drop Weid after a 4-goal game on return). TMac's saving grace will be, I suspect, if Brown isn't ready to play because he hasn't been able to properly train for a week. They may decide not to risk it and to leave Brown out another week. That would then give TMac another chance to stake his claim, and would ask Weid to go again and show it wasn't a fluke.

Yes and no - yes, ultimately what matters most is the score so if we’re winning by 5 goals then the frequency of their scores isn’t so important. But pre-2021 one of our biggest flaws was that when sides got through our forward half press they scored at will. Last year that was not the case and it meant if our forward half game was off we didn’t automatically lose. The two parts of our game work together and I’m confident the FD would be disappointed with 51% last night. IMO stemming from May struggling with Wright and the Hunt, Tomlinson, Smith trio not being near the Lever, Salem, Petty combo in terms of reading play, zoning and intercepting.

How about the Essendon win last year? Or the North and Adelaide wins last year?

39 inside 50s is an incredibly low count. But you can see the defensive issues we have right there with the 20 scoring shots. That’s a score from 51% of their entries. In the first two rounds we conceded the lowest and second lowest number of scores from inside 50s conceded, down in the low 30%s. So the fact it jumped to 51% last night indicates a concern with our backline, but also different sort of game/win (Essendon conceded territory by flooding more than GC or the Dogs did).

He won’t be dropped and nor should he but he wasn’t great tonight and our biggest problem right now is mistakes in our back half, which he, Hunt and Tomlinson are largely responsible for.

What? He dropped two marks which directly led to goals. His best game was just two weeks ago in Round 1 and this was miles off that. 6 - Oliver 5 - Brayshaw 4 - Bowey (this kid is unreal) 3 - Langdon 2 - Weideman 1 - Harmes

Brown straight back. Weid holds TMac out. TMac either goes back or dropped. Lever back. Hunt out I think. We can’t get the four missing defenders back quick enough.

Jeepers this thread is the Demonland of old. We have five best 22 players out, including four from the backline. We had A-grade players down on form (Gawn, Trac, May). We were horribly inaccurate early. We were off a six day break from a humid GC game. But we scored 99 and won by 5 goals. That’s a remarkable win IMO. We are supposed to be dropping games right now with our outs - remember Richmond in one of their flag years lost a stack of games early when they had injuries but rallied late? Essendon flooded back and dragged us down to their level. Teams are going to do that and when we’re not perfect we won’t blow teams away each week. @praha’s got this 100% right. Oliver outstanding, Brayshaw fantastic whilst being played out of position. Loved Jordon’s run, and Weideman surely pushes TMac out next week. Problems of course - the Hunt, Tomlinson, Smith trio are no good in the same backline and all three at times struggled tonight. Pickett’s struggling to get involved on offence, but his defence is still there. Spargo is sort of everywhere and nowhere. And Gawn’s badly out of form IMO. But honestly, we’re 3-0, already knocked off two of last year’s finalists and a 2022 finals contender, and we have seriously good cavalry to come back. This is happy days, not sad.

Agree with the previous posts on the commentators. Dwayne Russell is frustratingly OTT. Dermott hates us and every time he commentates on our games focuses almost exclusively on our opponent. And Healy is the new Sandy Roberts; so incredibly past it. There are so many good commentators available, it baffles me that Dwayne and Gerard are doing multiple calls per Round on TV/radio. I cannot for the life of me understand how anyone can watch football in silence. I'll take rubbish commentary over no sound at all.

You can mount an argument that every game we play this year is a danger game. Two of our four losses last year were to non-finalists, plus we drew with Hawthorn. Essendon can look a million bucks when they get going. But the reality is they play unaccountable football and don't work hard enough in defence. They were never any good last year, making the finals off the back of just one win against a top 8 side and 11 wins in total. Like with any opponent, if we're off our game we can lose. But I would absolutely love to see us "on" this week. The original plan was that the AFLW Grand Final was going to be on Saturday afternoon and they wanted to give it clean air, so they had to move a Saturday afternoon game to another timeslot. COVID ruined that plan though. Demons missing: Lever Salem Petty Hibberd

Wasn't sure where to rant about this but a thread called Stats Files might be right. Last year the AFL released a whole load of stats on players on a site called AFL Stats Pro. You could look up a player's career and season averages for pretty much all stats, and you could compare up to five players. This year - gone. Not replaced, or changed. Just gone. I cannot stand the stranglehold Champion Data has on statistics in our game.

Wait what's with all the posts about Howes debuting? Is he really in line to play? Wasn't in the named bests for Casey on the weekend and doesn't appear to fill any sort of need in our side?

We did it in Round 1 too, throwing Fritsch behind the ball from centre square bounces in the fourth when the game was very much done.

Good post and I don't really disagree with your comment on our defence and the need for Lever to come back. But out of interest I had a look at the stat for scores conceded from inside 50s against. The Dogs scored from 31% of their inside 50s, and Gold Coast 32%. Those the two lowest rates in the 17 games played so far. Next worst was North vs Hawthorn in Round 1 at 34%.

In May's post-game interview, he mentioned Bowey copped a couple of injuries/knocks, and also that Rivers probably came back "early" from his knee injury. Probably keep a watch on those two this week.

I thought this thread was going to be about how we now are on a 10-game winning streak against Gold Coast.

Jackson's first quarter goal came because he was able to capitalise on the short throw in!

Hawthorn had a day out vs Port. If they can kick 13.0 from set shots each week props to them, but history tells us they can't and won't repeat that weekly. Collingwood's two wins are nothing to write home about; pedestrian wins over St Kilda and Adelaide. To be fair, Carlton's beaten a top 4 and top 8 contender, and Hawthorn's beaten...well...I don't know what to call Port Adelaide this year. Sydney probably has the best resume so far, with wins over GWS and Geelong.

I probably worded it a bit strongly: I thought Smith was OK defensively but poor with the ball, had four clangers I think and I recall two really loose kicks which led to turnovers.

Wouldn't be too harsh on TMac, wasn't really the night for him to dominate. Some mail around suggests Lever won't be fit for a while. If Hibberd's fit I'd bring him in for Hunt who IMO struggled. Smith played poorly IMO but doesn't go after one bad game. Without any injuries, I doubt we'll see more than one change tbh.

I'm sure everyone expected Hawthorn to be on top of the ladder and Port to be on the bottom. Wonder what happened in that game.

6 - Petracca 5 - Jackson 4 - Bowey 3 - ANB 2 - May 1 - Oliver

Yeah we didn't look amazing but if you think that was a poor performance I think you're underrating Gold Coast. And the weather. Not sure the last time we played in hot and humid weather. I reckon the game ends quite differently if we nail one of those many misses in the fourth quarter. And don't forget we've again held our opponent to 19 scoring shots despite missing four premiership defenders. The risk with that backline was evident tonight though. Tomlinson was just OK and whilst Hunt and Smith did some good things defensively, they also turned it over a number of times each. We sorely lack Lever and Salem back there. Jackson and Bowey were unreal, Petracca is the game's best player, and I was really impressed with how Sparrow, Jordon and Pickett worked into the game after each struggled a bit last week. Wasn't the best night for Brown, Fritsch and TMac but we've pocketed a road win without injuries and I'm happy with that.