Jump to content

Jarka

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Jarka replied to jezhug's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think it would be best for young Roos to go to a club where his dad isn't the head coach
  2. To add some spice to this rumour, Coniglio is very good mates with Dom Tyson. By spice, I mean turmeric. Edit: Dazzledavey beat me to it.
  3. Knightmare always does a very detailed mock draft, also watch out for Quigley and Snoop Dog. Chris25 is very good with is SA boys. They're probably the best four in terms of knowledge of the game. Machsy is right, these guys do this as a hobby, although they do invest a lot of time they're not always right with their predictions. But let's face it, even the professionals get it wrong as well. What they do well is to give you an idea of the type of players they are, and to an armchair amateur like mw who doesn't have time to go and watch these kids, I'm very grateful for their contribution.
  4. Would Roos trade Tyson and Salem for pick 2 or for Kelly? No way, he wouldn't even trade one of those players for Kelly. Kelly has a long way to go to even match Tyson and there's no guarantee that it will happen.
  5. Jarka replied to Household Demon's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There was one piece of play that sums JKH up, he was just about to get the ball and was being tackled at the same time, he had the composure to take the tackle and to identify who to pass the ball as well. But it was the handball which was the most impressive part, he pretty much started the handballing action before he got the ball, so once he had it he instantly made contact with his fist and moved it on. Simply awesome
  6. It depresses me that I'm interested in this thread at this time of the year with a likely outcome that we'll probably have a top 2 pick. /sigh
  7. Jarka replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Need pen to paper to get excited, or at the very least content
  8. Jarka replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Edit, Just read your reply and fair enough, my fault for not reading the whole conversation and taking your post out of context. Cheers
  9. Jarka replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What a complete load of tripe, I watched him backing into oncoming packs to mark the ball all the time
  10. Jarka replied to Old Man Rivers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    *Did not complete his first pre-season* Let's see how he goes next year when fully fit (ie completes a full pre-season), my guess is that he'll be ok
  11. Jarka replied to Old Man Rivers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Where did this 'soft' tag come from? I've seen him put his body on the live several times, don't understand the fascination from people who want 1st year kids to end up with career threatening injuries because they recklessly throw their under matired bodies around
  12. Jarka replied to Old Man Rivers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I must be missing something, I've never been worried about Toumpas at all. I'm extremely confident he's going ot be one of our best players in the future.
  13. Jarka replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Oh ok, my apologies. I've heard that from others. Absolutely there were people locked out, a big line of very unhappy demon fans singing the theme song.
  14. Jarka replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    This is a forum discussing the MFC, if people want to discuss the past then how does it harm you in any way at all? As you have seen people are still highly emotional about it, they need to vent their anger ans hatred about feeling betrayed (Hitler comparison's aside). You clearly don't want to hear about it so don't open the thread. Simple solution, everyone's happy.
  15. Jarka replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I know abou the 'Guest' proxy cheating. He purchased memberships for all his staff then submitted proxy voyes on their behalf. No idea if they even knew they had a membership, pathetic stuff and in my opinion at the very least it's against the spirit of a sporting club, and very close to being illegal (can any solicitors assist here, unless you're going to charge me per minute...). Now, about the lockout. I've previously explained what I believed to have taken place, but I want to go into more depth with your opinion. So, what you're saying is that there were people at the doors asking people how they were going to vote and not allowing them in whilst letting the pro-mergers through? Because this is what you're saying.