Ethan Tremblay

Not the greatest AA squad I’ve seen named. Buddy to be the Captain?

Imagine that.. trade period 2023, post T. Lamb reading Demonland.. Lamb: We’ve offered pick 4, 18 and a future first for West Coasts pick 1 and a future second, we actually have an “in-principal” deal with them. We’d then like to split pick 1 with North for picks 2 and 3 and we’re also going to throw in our future second. We’ll then split pick 3 and trade that to Adelaide their first round this year and their first next year with a third rounder also going their way. Pick 3 we may retain but may also float it for the right price.

One of those rarer cases where he’d probably be on more if he stayed at Essendon. I can’t see any club matching or bettering what Essendon have (allegedly) tabled.

He looks like a man-child. It’s a no for me.

He’s clear of a broken wrist?

I’ve rewatched that interaction a few times now and am pretty sure he said, “I need to pee.”

Will we play him round 1?

Anthony Hudson’s going to knock the top off it soon.. the Carlton love-fest from him is becoming a little too gross.

Stomper in the commentary box has been on the helium.

Yup. With Eagles dropping back to the bottom of the ladder, it’s basically a done deal. Toot toot.

So many out on the fulls.

@Grand New Flag, with North winning looks like that “in-principal” deal with the Eagles is back on! Toot toot, happy days.

Good to see the big Woody getting involved!

Josh Daicos’ nickname is blister, pops up when the hard works done.

How was that not holding the ball against Elliott?

Has Elliott ever marked the ball and not tumbled?

Poor fellas going to struggle if he has to come on for more than half of a quarter.

Essendon are tough to watch.

He’s a bloody cheeky bugger that Kane Cornes, isn’t he?

Ed Richards would have to be Captain of the Ginger’s.

There is zero chance that we had an “in-principal” deal with WCE. It is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard, I have no idea how people still get sucked in by your garbage. The part about Lyon being “involved at a personal level” did give me a laugh though, so points there.

I do agree with what you’re saying, as a broader issue type. But in the given circumstances and with the rules the way they’re currently written, the goal umpire himself is the one at fault. He should have called for a review. If he did, it would have been overturned and called a goal.

It’s completely the goal umpires fault. The umpire: - called it a point; and - didn’t request a score review. under the laws of the game, points aren’t reviewed. I fail to see how this is anyone’s fault except the goal umpire’s.

Is this Laurie’s first game? Edit: third.

You just know Bowey isn’t going to waste a kick.