Jump to content

Demonland

Primary Administrators
  • Posts

    35,828
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    454

Everything posted by Demonland

  1. We also have a voicemail from Noah M that we will play on the show. If you want to leave a voice message for us that we'll play on the show call 03 9016 3666. Don't worry nobody answers when we're not LIVE so just wait for it to ring out and leave a message.
  2. Question from Andrew H from the Demonland Facebook Page Messenger: Question for Pod if able. Do you think Geelong will be at a disadvantage playing finals on the MCG rather than their home ground. Growdy, long time listener & Trident member.
  3. Whether they should have been awarded or not in another game is questionable but in the context of the frees award to the pies directly in front of their goals they most definitely should have been awarded.
  4. I'll need more than that. I might need an exorcism.
  5. Fox Footy reckons this will be the first week of finals.
  6. Feel free to post your questions and comments for the guys and we'll read them out on the show.
  7. Join @george_on_the_outer, @binman & I on the Demonland Podcast Monday night 8th August LIVE @ 8:30pm for breakdown of the Round 21 loss to Collingwood. Listen & Chat LIVE: https://demonland.com/podcast Call: 03 9016 3666 Skype: Demonland31
  8. Before the match it was claimed that Collingwood were a “one trick pony” side. Well that one trick worked very well against Melbourne, as they extended their winning streak to 11 for the season. Meanwhile, the Demons continued to horse around with structures which simply haven’t been working. The one tall forward option with resting rucks failed yet again, in an almost identical manner to the game against the Bulldogs recently. 93 more possessions, 65 inside 50 entries 24 more than the opposition, and the side loses the game? Surely we were just horsing around? Unless the team kicks goals, and unless the forwards contain the ball in the forward half, it simply rebounds down the other end where the opposition easily score. Don’t blame the defence, they are being overrun. It is the forwards who are simply not doing the work or executing their role. Even the coach recognized this in his post match conference where he used the terms “ failed to execute in bigger moments….when it really mattered”. “ we have to convert” … Translation: kicking the easy goals. “Collingwood able to transition from the back half …” Translation: the Forwards were slack. And the fans have seen this all too often during the season. Yes, we have been hampered with injury and unavailability of forward targets, but now is the seventh time this season we have given up 3-4 goal leads. Is the team running out of steam? Or is it we are just not burying teams when we should? The failure to select a second tall forward just repeated the old experiment, and we got the same result. Ben Brown works hard presenting , particularly upfield, and who does that leave down forward? To top it off he only plays 76% game time? In this game we saw Bayley Fritsch and Jake Melksham as the only targets left in front of goal, covered by Moore and Howe. Easy pickings for Collingwood. And they were off to the races … How many tackles from our forwards in the 50m area? Neal-Bullen, Spargo and Pickett zero! Aren’t these players so called “defensive forwards”? Combine that with Brown at zero for the game, and Fritsch and Melksham only two, and you get an idea of why the ball rebounds out of there so easily which is precisely what Collingwood wanted. Back to Goodwin’s “failure to execute” statement. That not only means kicking goals when we should (and sadly Max has returned to his worst kicking action in front of goal), but it also means the same in general play. Neal-Bullen is rapidly losing his value to the side when he cannot execute simple football skills, thus destroying hard fought forward thrusts, putting up a solitary possession for the final quarter. Melksham returned to his pursuit of cheap out the back kicks instead of getting in front which he did last week and had zero touches in total for the final quarter. The resting rucks again produced zero majors for yet another week. Small wonder they are exhausted in the final stages of the match, when they spend so much time on the ground, even to no effect up front. So you finish up with a forward line which won’t tackle, can’t execute basic kicking and marking skills, and are unable to provide a suitable tall target despite 65 entries into their area. In some sort of positive, the mids completed dominated. Those 65 entries came courtesy of the hard work of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Angus Brayshaw and Jack Viney upfield. Even Max, despite concrete kicking boots managed 31 touches and 490m gained, a high for the side. Down back Christian Salem seems to have regained his kicking strength and ability to find targets when no-one else can. Ed Langdon was threatened by Collingwood players and fans for his mid-week comments, but produced the appropriate on-field response with 22 touches on the wing and a timely goal as well. But it was all for nothing because the Collingwood one-trick pony was off to the races, and outlasted the Demons favourite who could only manage three goals in the second half of football. What is now needed is for a scratching of a few of those Dee frontrunners who look more like draught horses, with some younger yearlings who could provide no worse output than is currently being provided. And perhaps they might just enable the side to get their noses in front when it matters rather than stumbling at the finish line. MELBOURNE 6.2.38 10.7.67 11.11.77 13.11.89 COLLINGWOOD 5.0.30 8.2.50 11.4.70 15.6.96 GOALS MELBOURNE Brown Fritsch 2 Langdon Melksham Neal-Bullen Petracca Pickett Salem Spargo Sparrow Viney COLLINGWOOD Elliott Johnson 4 Mihocek 2 Cox J.Daicos De Goey Lipinsky McCreery BEST MELBOURNE Petracca Oliver Brayshaw Gawn Jordon Viney COLLINGWOOD Elliott Johnson N Daicos De Goey Crisp Maynard INJURIES MELBOURNE Nil COLLINGWOOD Hoskin-Elliott (hip) REPORTS MELBOURNE Nil COLLINGWOOD Nil SUBSTITUTES MELBOURNE James Harmes (unused) COLLINGWOOD Trent Bianco (replaced Will Hoskin-Elliott in the third quarter) UMPIRES Andrew Stephens Robert Findlay Simon Meredith CROWD 70,956 at the MCG
  9. Clayton is hard to beat … 220. Clayton Oliver 168. Christian Petracca 135. Angus Brayshaw 128. Jack Viney 103. Max Gawn 75. Steven May 71. Ed Langdon 52. James Jordon 40. Kysaiah Pickett 32. Jake Lever 31. Luke Jackson 29. Bayley Fritsch 26. James Harmes 22. Jake Bowey Michael Hibberd Harry Petty Tom Sparrow 18. Ben Brown 11. Alex Neal-Bullen 8. Tom McDonald Sam Weideman 5. Jayden Hunt Charlie Spargo 4. Christian Salem 3. Joel Smith
  10. Please cast your votes 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 …
  11. Pies have kicked 11 goals straight in their last two quarters against Melbourne.
  12. Reckon we’ll be outnumbered tonight but thanks for the $$$$
  13. https://www.sen.com.au/news/2022/08/05/josh-jenkins-full-statement-on-the-adelaide-crows-2018-pre-season-camp/
  14. Not much but imagine our potency with a fit TMac & BBB.
  15. https://marvelstadium.com.au/members/dress-code/ Smart casual is the minimum dress standard for the Medallion Club. Not withstanding the dress standards outlined, the Medallion Club reserves the right to refuse entry to any person considered inappropriately attired. To avoid embarrassment or inconvenience, please note the following unacceptable clothing items: Sleeveless tops (tank tops, singlet tops, football jumpers with no sleeved top underneath) Rubber thongs, ugg boots or moccasins Beach wear or midriff tops Tracksuit pants or sports attire Untidy or dirty clothing Are you dining? If dining in The Grille (Marvel Stadium) or Medallion Club Dining at the MCG, in addition to the above, please note the following standards apply: A collared shirt, or a smart polo, blouse or dress is the minimum accepted standard Dress shoes or neat sport shoes must be worn No hats or beanies
  16. IN – Brown OUT – Weideman (omitted)
  17. Perhaps a Tweet/Article to prepare the masses for a surprise selection either this week or next?
  18. It can work in your favour. Might rile them up to the point where they attack Ed and they lose focus.
×
×
  • Create New...