Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Well, here we are again.  Melbourne's season is over, there's no footy at all this week and the Demonland boards are deathly quiet as there are clearly no football issues worth discussing at the moment (unless I've missed something).

It's that time when gardens get attention, odd jobs are caught up on, and we re-establish contact with our family.

I spoke to mine only last night and they seem nice, although I was somewhat surprised to learn that my wife no longer works at Brashs.

When things are so boring, the only real option is to fill in all that spare time with another brainteaser.

Today's team is a mix of past and present players, including six former Demons, that looks quite strong on paper. 

What common factor unites the players in today's team?  Answers in a PM only s'il vous plait.

 

=========================================================================

 

B:       Brian Lake     Rod Carter     George Hewitt

H/B:   Bob Murphy     Tom Stewart     Troy Longmuir

C:       Stan Alves     Tim Watson     Patrick Dangerfield

H/F:    Charlie Cameron     Joe Daniher     Archie Perkins

F:       Willie Rioli     Fred Fanning     Bobby Hill

R:       Carl Ditterich     Nick Daicos     Todd Viney

I/C:     Ned Moyle     Eric Hipwood     Peter Wright     Chris Connolly

SUB:   John Noble

 

 
  • Author

There have been a couple of nibbles, but the bait is still on the hook.

The team needs a coach and Stuart Dew has been duly appointed.  Onya Stewie!

Edited by Demonstone

  • Author

We have a winner!

Congratulations are in order for @mo64 who has solved the mystery and, in doing so, given his personal brand an immeasurable boost.

 
  • Author

I thought we may have had more players.  It's not like there's anything else to distract us right now.

My bad.  I probably need to be locked up in a cell (or something like that).

Edited by Demonstone

  • Author

I have to bail out for tonight, but will leave you with another clue.

There are more than one set of father/sons in the solution.

Maybe that might help to draw some inspiration.

Edited by Demonstone


  • Author

I thought by now that other matters may have quietened down and you'd be looking for a diversion.

* voiceover*  But they hadn't quietened down.  There was debate raging on several fronts.

Any further responses would be unreal.  You might say the same about the answer.

Who will be in the frame for second and third place?

Edited by Demonstone

  • Author

I really expected a more animated conversation, but I'm fresh out of clues.

Answer to be revealed later this arvo for anybody with a modicum of interest.

  • Author

Time to put this debacle out of its misery.  I really stuffed up with the timing of this, didn't I?  :wacko:

My team all share a first name with a cartoon character, as shown below.

 

B:       Brian Griffin     Rod Flanders     George Jetson

H/B:   (Sideshow) Bob Terwilliger   Tom Cat     Troy McClure

C:       Stan Marsh     (Reverend) Tim Lovejoy     Patrick Star

H/F:    Charlie Brown     (Mayor) Joe Quimby     Archie Andrews

F:       (Groundskeeper) Willie MacDougal     Fred Flintstone     Bobby Hill :cool:

R:       Carl Carlson     (Doctor) Nick Riviera     Todd Flanders

I/C:    Ned Flanders     Eric Cartman     Peter Griffin     Chris Griffin

SUB:   (Professor) John Frink

COACH:  Stewie Griffin 

 

We must be in different generations Mr D ... I only recognise a handful of those characters! 

Just as well I didn't try too hard to solve the puzzle, eh!.  My brain would be fried trying to remember something that isn't there!!!

As always thanks for your work ...

Edited by Lucifers Hero


12 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Almost half of the characters are from 'The Simpsons'.  Not a fan, Luci?

A passing interest.  In the FTA days it was in the wrong time slot.  Nowadays, other things to do.

Of the little I saw - a very clever show!

I've only just seen this, @Demonstone! You went WAY too early with the reveal! 🥺

Nice to have your OP for a wake-up chuckle, though!😄

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 62 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 304 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies