Jump to content

Optimist only!

Featured Replies

What I'm most optimistic about this team in the future is Simon Goodwin coaching, players who he coached at Essendon want to come play with us because of him. That makes me think his a really good peoples person and players will want to play for him, follow his game plan and play harder to make sure he stays around.

Remember how hard it was for Mark Neeld to get Collingwood players over? There was obviously a reason for that.

 
2 minutes ago, ILLDieADemon said:

Remember how hard it was for Mark Neeld to get Collingwood players over? There was obviously a reason for that.

Errrrrrr.......

 

On 26 June 2016 at 9:50 AM, ILLDieADemon said:

What I'm most optimistic about this team in the future is Simon Goodwin coaching, players who he coached at Essendon want to come play with us because of him. That makes me think his a really good peoples person and players will want to play for him, follow his game plan and play harder to make sure he stays around.

Remember how hard it was for Mark Neeld to get Collingwood players over? There was obviously a reason for that.

Dawes came over within half an hour of Neeld signing. 

I don't want Goodwin to be mates with players. That causes division. 

He must have full respect from all players

Do what i say. 

 
1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Dawes came over within half an hour of Neeld signing. 

I don't want Goodwin to be mates with players. That causes division. 

He must have full respect from all players

Do what i say. 

Please read the thread title SWYL.

25 minutes ago, Ricky P said:

Please read the thread title SWYL.

Got nothing to do with it when ridiculous statements are made. 

Neeld was a dud coach but he had no problem bringing players with him. 


2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Got nothing to do with it when ridiculous statements are made. 

Neeld was a dud coach but he had no problem bringing players with him. 

No, really. You have the rest of Demonland to be unerringly negative.

2 hours ago, Ricky P said:

No, really. You have the rest of Demonland to be unerringly negative.

So ridiculous statements are all ok in here are they?

On 27 June 2016 at 2:38 PM, Sir Why You Little said:

Dawes came over within half an hour of Neeld signing. 

I don't want Goodwin to be mates with players. That causes division. 

He must have full respect from all players

Do what i say. 

If it was that quick then why was it reported that after several calls to Daws He had to knock his door down to talk him into it?

Why was it also reported that the only club Wellingham didn't want to be traded to was Melbourne when his old midfield coach was now head coach there?

The "do what I say" management goes not work on Gen Y mate.

 
2 hours ago, ILLDieADemon said:

If it was that quick then why was it reported that after several calls to Daws He had to knock his door down to talk him into it?

Why was it also reported that the only club Wellingham didn't want to be traded to was Melbourne when his old midfield coach was now head coach there?

The "do what I say" management goes not work on Gen Y mate.

Respect always wins out

Wellingham always wanted to go home. He was never going to a Victorian Club

On 6/28/2016 at 0:06 AM, Sir Why You Little said:

So ridiculous statements are all ok in here are they?

Nothing ridiculous about d'land SW! Nothing at all! 

 


54 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Respect always wins out

Wellingham always wanted to go home. He was never going to a Victorian Club

There is a world of difference between 'do what I say' and respect. Having respect for someone can mean you do what they say, doing what someone says does not mean you have respect for them. If fact, having someone heavy handed and demanding often means there is little respect as respect is a two way street.

If you listen to Roos' comments a while back it is clear he has changed how he manages the players as the young guys respond to different stimuli. The 'gen y' kids want to be taught, they want to be listened to, and they want to learn. If you can give them that then they will respect you and will follow you lead. The world they have been bought up in is faster with infinitely more options so if you go down the authoritarian route then you lose then very quickly and they look for other options where they can learn. 

This is different to how it was and is better in some ways, it is also worse in some ways. It just takes a bit of an adjustment to the way we think and you get the same outcome, sometimes a better one.

On 28/06/2016 at 0:06 AM, Sir Why You Little said:

So ridiculous statements are all ok in here are they?

If they weren't Demonland would cease to exist

36 minutes ago, Chris said:

There is a world of difference between 'do what I say' and respect. Having respect for someone can mean you do what they say, doing what someone says does not mean you have respect for them. If fact, having someone heavy handed and demanding often means there is little respect as respect is a two way street.

If you listen to Roos' comments a while back it is clear he has changed how he manages the players as the young guys respond to different stimuli. The 'gen y' kids want to be taught, they want to be listened to, and they want to learn. If you can give them that then they will respect you and will follow you lead. The world they have been bought up in is faster with infinitely more options so if you go down the authoritarian route then you lose then very quickly and they look for other options where they can learn. 

This is different to how it was and is better in some ways, it is also worse in some ways. It just takes a bit of an adjustment to the way we think and you get the same outcome, sometimes a better one.

I never meant a coach has to yell and scream at players. 

By Respect i mean you don't have to be best mates to have Respect. 

I think we are on the same page. 

2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I never meant a coach has to yell and scream at players. 

By Respect i mean you don't have to be best mates to have Respect. 

I think we are on the same page. 

Agreed, I think the 'do as I say' line must have come across the wrong way as it made it seem very authoritarian. 

3 minutes ago, Chris said:

Agreed, I think the 'do as I say' line must have come across the wrong way as it made it seem very authoritarian. 

The kids want to learn so they do it the way the coach instructs them. If they follow that through and it works then mutual Respect will grow. 

Goodwin better know the way to do it. 

He is in charge. The FD and Players must Respect that.

If that Respect breaks down or favourites are given preference Goodwin won't make it


We're not that far off the pace, as evidenced by our results against current top 8 teams thus far this year...

  • GWS now in 4th place - in round 1 Melb - 80 def GWS 78 (win by 2 pts)
  • North now in 5th place - in round 3 North - 136 def Melb 131 (loss by 5 pts)
  • Doggies now in 7th place - in round 8 Doggies - 114 def Melb 82 (loss by 32 pts)
  • Hawkes now in 1st place - in round 11 Hawks - 82 def Melb 64 (loss by 18 pts)
  • Swans now in 2nd place - in round 13 Swans - 86 def Melb 31 (loss by 55 pts)

Average margin is a 21.6 pts loss.

4 of our 7 losses are to top 8 teams

1 of our 6 wins are over top 8 teams

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 523 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and 
 it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies