Why is that response no surprise? (Don't answer this, it's more a statement)

RR has since clarified and confirmed it all on my behalf. Nothing cryptic WYL.

I was simply stating the facts for you...

ie. That Rounds 1 & 2 results will not ultimately determine the results of rounds 3 & 4. (Which you said initially they would determine)

cryptic because i hadn't seen it.

I will answer when appropriate thanks

It's really hard to say what would be a pass mark for the team this year so it's really hard to know just how to judge Mark Neeld.

I expect us to be a much better team in general this year, last year we weren't of an AFL standard in patches.

14 home games and an easy draw should give us a few more wins but need to be realistic.

i'd say Neeld would need at least 5 wins, an obvious improvement in competitiveness and no massive floggings to be a pass but that's just me.

cryptic because i hadn't seen it.

I will answer when appropriate thanks

Lol. What, after round 4? You will be still be incorrect whatever the results.

Like clockwork, I'm now expecting you to "move the goalposts" from your original nonsense statement......

Fact is, each week is a different set of circumstances, one weekend of football cannot ultimately determine the result of the following round's football result. Different games can have different lists take the field and different attitudes, different structures, different plans and set-ups.

Lol. What, after round 4? You will be still be incorrect whatever the results.

what are you on about? Milk was off this morning in your cereal?

If we lose the first 2 games then 3-4 are a much harder prospect.

Win the first 2 and confidence is high.

That was the point of my comment.

It's a fair call.