Jump to content

Leigh Brown to Melbourne

Featured Replies

 

It would seem that Mahoney is respected at the club. He was replaced as forward coach but retained in the football department. It must be the perception that he is a quality football person with a lot to offer. I think that is the most productive approach to getting a great team together. Use the best people in the roles that suit them best.

It would seem that Mahoney is respected at the club. He was replaced as forward coach but retained in the football department. It must be the perception that he is a quality football person with a lot to offer. I think that is the most productive approach to getting a great team together. Use the best people in the roles that suit them best.

Yeah that or he was still contracted (unsure about this).

 

Fair call. But surely he takes some of the blame for our forwards' inability to hold their positions/structures. And surely he takes the blame for some of our forwards' lack of development (e.g. Newton, Miller, Dunn, Bate). Of course, so does Bailey, and the midfield is also to blame. But one statistic does not validate his performance, even if it does give him something to hold his hat on.

Maybe Newton, Miller, Dunn and Bate have reached the zenith of their football ability. Miller is honest but limited and was so under a number of coaches. By the time Mahoney got to coach Newton he already had big question marks in core areas. Dunn and Bate have underperformed or performed to their ceiling under a number of coaches.

Mahoney had an uphill battle given the lack of mature forward talent and an incredibly young side to have an effective forward.

It beat me how posters can make definitive judgements on the performance of assistant coaches when they would not have a clue as to their actual role input, responsibiilties and accountabilities.

Maybe Newton, Miller, Dunn and Bate have reached the zenith of their football ability. Miller is honest but limited and was so under a number of coaches. By the time Mahoney got to coach Newton he already had big question marks in core areas. Dunn and Bate have underperformed or performed to their ceiling under a number of coaches.

Mahoney had an uphill battle given the lack of mature forward talent and an incredibly young side to have an effective forward.

It beat me how posters can make definitive judgements on the performance of assistant coaches when they would not have a clue as to their actual role input, responsibiilties and accountabilities.

Agree RR I have no idea how good our coaching staff were in 2011.

I suspect that JC could not have done much better with our playing list in 2011.

It probably boils down to the head coaches directives.

The coaching panel can be removed, it is not so easy to make wholesale changes to the playing list.


Yes, we had a dud list.

No, that does not mean that Mahoney and West get excused from our bad performances.

If Bailey (rightly) copped blame, I fail to see how assistant coaches are absolved.

Nasher, don't be facetious. What did you want me to do, apportion numbers detailing the proportion of blame spread around? I was merely addressing someone else's view that Mahoney had actually been a decent coach because our conversion rate once inside 50 was good. That statistic may well reveal that he did some good work, but I don't think that's enough to say Mahoney was a good coach. I think there are plenty of areas we can improve on in our forward line and some of the fact that our forward line isn't terribly good at the moment stems in part from Mahoney.

To say that the lack of improvement in our forwards is solely due to their crappiness lets coaches off the hook. No doubt he was dealt a crap hand. But surely part of a coach's job is to develop players, whether they're the cream of the crop or the worst on the list. The fact that we had/have forwards on our list who haven't developed a lot cannot be solely the players' fault. No one expected players like Newton or Dunn to be the next Franklin/Johnson. But to at least see some development in our forward players over the past few years would have been nice, and the fact we haven't had that surely lies in part with Mahoney's drawbacks as a coach.

For the record, I never said he was a good coach, just that I didn't understand why everyone thought he was a dud. The FD obviously thought he was doing something right, or he wouldn't have had his contract renewed, and thus wouldn't be under contract for this year.

To be honest, I wouldn't have the foggiest if he's a good coach or not, because I'm not a forward for the MFC.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 33 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 105 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 24 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 264 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland