Over the past 3yrs we have only beaten Essendon and Richmond. That alone is the reason we

1. will not make the 8

2. why we will sack Bailey.

It's pathetic!

Any possibility that it's because we've been worse than all the other Victorian teams since Bailey's been at the helm?

I really do hate this argument (if you can call it an argument). Such an illogical, ill-thought, ridiculous, and inconsequential thing to care about.

This year alone, I'd say games against the Roos, Dogs and Saints where games we really should've won, or at the very least, been a hell of a lot more competitive.

Seems to be a combination of 'Poor Victorian' and 'Poor Etihad' form.

Over the past 3yrs we have only beaten Essendon and Richmond. That alone is the reason we

1. will not make the 8

2. why we will sack Bailey.

It's pathetic!

thinking about this as well, and I agree totally.

That stat says more about Richmond and Essendon than anything else because we were absolutely terrible over the last 3 seasons.

And, but for three points, we could have won two against the Premier last year. Probably would have beaten the Doggies if not for field umps over-ruling corrects calls for goals and the same umps running around dressed as our players.

Woulda, shoulda, didn't - sure, but it certainly adds some perspective.