Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
10 minutes ago, Macca said:

The 2 games tomorrow are of high interest for all sorts of reasons.  The Rams @ Raiders game especially.  Gruden might have some surprises in store for us.  And such is the divisional implications in the NFC North I'll be barracking hard for the J.E.T.S tomorrow!  That's divisional football for you. 

I have the mother of all close games in fantasy. Gurley to come for me, then Kerryon Johnson and Rams D to come for my opponent and I'm 6 points adrift. It was game over until Cobb caught his 75 yarder and suddenly I was alive. Cobb = old faithful for me.

 
38 minutes ago, Dappa Dan said:

I have the mother of all close games in fantasy. Gurley to come for me, then Kerryon Johnson and Rams D to come for my opponent and I'm 6 points adrift. It was game over until Cobb caught his 75 yarder and suddenly I was alive. Cobb = old faithful for me.

Good luck with all that Dappa ... I'm busy trying to figure out a trifecta combo in the 7th at Moe tomorrow!  ?

Anyway,  a number of ex-players are making mention of the rustiness of teams early in the season with references to the lack of intensity in the practice games.  I guess we're just going to have to live with it as the teams don't want to risk their stars until the main games begin.

It's only week 1 but a number of the better credentialed teams have limped over the line or have failed to win when favoured to do so (Steelers,  Saints,  Chargers,  Dallas,  Seahawks)

  • Author
1 minute ago, Macca said:

It's only week 1 but a number of the better credentialed teams have limped over the line or have failed to win when favoured to do so (Steelers,  Saints,  Chargers,  Dallas,  Seahawks)

Chargers should be disappointed. They're stacked.

Dallas I think will fall away a bit. Dak and Zeke were really mediocre, and i can't see where they turn it around.

Hawks losing surprised the hell out of me too. That news will likely get lost in the Bucs/Saints and Packers noise.

 
  • Author
12 minutes ago, Macca said:

 

With Rodgers, one of two things happens. Either they scan and reveal minor bruising and soreness that calms down, everyone is relieved and says wow what a performance, how tough is he.... OR.... it's something more major like a strained MCL or whatever, in which case that game takes on even MORE mythical proportions. If it turns out to be the latter... then my god, how did he DO that?

1 minute ago, Dappa Dan said:

With Rodgers, one of two things happens. Either they scan and reveal minor bruising and soreness that calms down, everyone is relieved and says wow what a performance, how tough is he.... OR.... it's something more major like a strained MCL or whatever, in which case that game takes on even MORE mythical proportions. If it turns out to be the latter... then my god, how did he DO that?

He's obviously had a jab or 2 to get back out there but knee injuries are notoriously difficult to evaluate unless it's an ACL (which it isn't)

We're going to have to wait until Wednesday and even then we probably won't know all the details.  MCL strains can be 2 weeks up to 2 months yeah?  We've got the Vikings at home next week but if it is to be Kizer for a time,  we can at least compete at the QB position.  Happy to see the end of Hundley. 

I watched the movements of Rodgers very closely and he moved reasonably well,  all things considered.  But I'm no Doctor haha


I’ve just finished watching the Niners and Vikings in full. Good Minnesota debut for Cousins. Garoppolo did it a bit tough and had 3 picks. A few dropped catches here and there didn’t help and losing our no.1 RB and then our no.1 WR during the game never helps. 8 point loss to a very good team though, hopefully they can learn from it.

I’m now going to watch highlights of the other games. Sounds like the Bucs really surprised. 

  • Author
35 minutes ago, layzie said:

Garoppolo did it a bit tough and had 3 picks. A few dropped catches here and there didn’t help and losing our no.1 RB and then our no.1 WR during the game never helps. 8 point loss to a very good team though, hopefully they can learn from it.

I somehow ended up with Garroppolo in every league. I'm not jumping off him just yet. He did some good things. 250+ yards against Vikings is nothing to sniff one's nose at.

Just now, Dappa Dan said:

I somehow ended up with Garroppolo in every league. I'm not jumping off him just yet. He did some good things. 250+ yards against Vikings is nothing to sniff one's nose at.

He definitely hung in there, just a few errant throws. He’ll learn from it.

 
  • Author
1 minute ago, layzie said:

He definitely hung in there, just a few errant throws. He’ll learn from it.

Definitely. And the quality was there to see. Loved seeing him get furious at himself and everyone around him after one of his picks. Kept taking the game on too.

Just now, Dappa Dan said:

Definitely. And the quality was there to see. Loved seeing him get furious at himself and everyone around him after one of his picks. Kept taking the game on too.

Yeah that’s the thing. He threw that pick 6 but it didn’t stop him from going deep and he found Pettis on the next one. You gotta be able to forget that last throw.


As great as Rodgers was, Fuller drops another interception... he is terrible for that.

I never understand why if you know you are going to use all four downs that you don’t go for 3-5 yard pickups opposed to the 10yrds each time like the bears did, they do a few of those and then GB D has to play slightly closer giving more room over the top. They only needed a FG. And after Mathews massive brain fart they had d3cent field position.

  • Author
49 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Super poor effort first up by the Rams, Raiders sliced them all over the place.

Settled down now. This is the inverse of the Eagles Falcons game that started the round. Seeing some pretty damn good football from both sides.

1 minute ago, Dappa Dan said:

Settled down now. This is the inverse of the Eagles Falcons game that started the round. Seeing some pretty damn good football from both sides.

Cook is killing us... Cook!!!


  • Author
1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Cook is killing us... Cook!!!

IKR. ALl those names and that's the one they go for? This is Rams D for goodness sake...

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Cook is killing us... Cook!!!

I'm still not too worried. The hurry up they're doing to interrupt Donald ans Suh won't last forever.

  • Author
1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

INTERCEPTION!!!

lol... See?

Man that hurts me. I'm against Rams D... And I have Gurley... and am 10 points adrift now. Need 100 yards from Gurley plus a score I think.

I was going to write that this is like our first few games last year where we would give up big runs quite regularly until we managed to get on top of it. Hope during the break they can readjust as make some of those 12 yard runs only 5-6 instead. 


  • Author

Gee whiz... phew

 

Goff throwing into a 3 on 1 on the GL... not his smartest throw.

I reckon we will use Gurley more in the later part of the 3rd team when players start to tire.

  • Author
Just now, Gorgoroth said:

Goff throwing into a 3 on 1 on the GL... not his smartest throw.

I reckon we will use Gurley more in the later part of the 3rd team when players start to tire.

Well that gives me hope. Tell you what, nothing's changed. Rams still great to watch.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 24 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies