Just wondering. There was a lot of talk on Demonland last year about Chris Kangars Now he has been delisted by the cats, should we go after him.

www.afl.com.au - source

Liam Bedford and Chris Kangars were also delisted this week but Balme said he was confident that the remaining rookie-listed players on the Cats’ list – including ruckman Shane Mumford – would accept another rookie contract and remain at the club.

Maybe North should go after him?

Maybe North should go after him?

LOL

That is the funniest posts on demonland ever.

LOL

That is the funniest posts on demonland ever.

Well thank you! I'll be here all week. All I need is an article about Dane Swan and Paul Roos and I'd be set. Not to mention Ross Lyon.

While Kangars has atheltic abillity - his kicking is downright awfull (or was back in his under 18 days).

While Kangars has atheltic abillity - his kicking is downright awfull (or was back in his under 18 days).

While Kangars has atheltic abillity - his kicking is downright awfull (or was back in his under 18 days).

While Kangars has atheltic abillity - his kicking is downright awfull (or was back in his under 18 days).

Well given that poster is both Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde, each of them is entitled to his opinion. One of them must have double posted, though. But then Big Neita had to come along and draw attention to his/their schizophrenia. Nice going! Now you've probably gone and made him/them/it upset.

Well given that poster is both Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde, each of them is entitled to his opinion. One of them must have double posted, though. But then Big Neita had to come along and draw attention to his/their schizophrenia. Nice going! Now you've probably gone and made him/them/it upset.

haha.

but seriously there was a reason Kangars was delisted and lasted till halfway through the rookie draft last year, he's no good.